Adieu

@fmf said
The malicious action started and finished with you.

There was nothing "malicious" about using a light-hearted pseudonym in order to put a second story in the show.

Sure, but that wasn't what happened. We both know that.

@fmf said

My "scenario" is genuine and there are no "coincidences" involved.

I have already listed them.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Of course they could be right. Nobody is immune to mental health issues. On internet forums however, it is usually a throw away comment not a diagnosis.

On internet forums however, it is usually a throw away comment not a diagnosis.

What did you think of Suzianne's "diagnosis" that I was suffering from a mental health issue related to malignant narcissism complete with a link to a mental health journal?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I have already listed them.

But there weren't any "coincidences". This notion that there were is part of the "wrong assumption" that lead to your effort to sabotage the radio show.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Sure, but that wasn't what happened. We both know that.

Nope. "We [don't] both know that." There was nothing "malicious" about using a light-hearted pseudonym in order to put a second story in the show. Your vindictive action thereafter was rooted in you misreading the situation.

@fmf said
On internet forums however, it is usually a throw away comment not a diagnosis.

What did you think of Suzianne's "diagnosis" that I was suffering from a mental health issue related to malignant narcissism complete with a link to a mental health journal?

I guess she based that on her online experiences with your character. None of us here however can diagnose such things in any meaningful sense.

@fmf said
Nope. "We [don't] both know that." There was nothing "malicious" about using a light-hearted pseudonym in order to put a second story in the show. Your vindictive action thereafter was rooted in you misreading the situation.

Repeating that flawed mantra doesn't change anything.

At least, going forward, you have learned the importance of consent.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I guess she based that on her online experiences with your character. None of us here however can diagnose such things in any meaningful sense.

None of us here however can diagnose such things in any meaningful sense.

Did you say that to her when she posted her diagnosis?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Repeating that flawed mantra doesn't change anything.

I am not attempting to change anything. In the wake of our disagreement about some comings and goings on this message board, it was you who acted vindictively not me.

@fmf said
None of us here however can diagnose such things in any meaningful sense.

Did you say that to her when she posted her diagnosis?

I didn't see it.

I'm sure you will hate that answer.

@fmf said
I am not attempting to change anything. In the wake of our disagreement about some comings and goings on this message board, it was you who acted vindictively not me.

That was all you sir.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
I didn't see it.

I'm sure you will hate that answer.

I drew it to your attention at the time. While the thread was still active.

@fmf said
I drew it to your attention at the time. While the thread was still active.

When? How far are we going back?

@ghost-of-a-duke said
That was all you sir.

It wasn't me who wrote a hysterical accusatory letter to the radio station and got the show taken off the air temporarily. It was you. What had I done? I'd used a pseudonym for one of your stories.

@ghost-of-a-duke said
When? How far are we going back?

Not that long before Suzianne started this thread. But you say you didn't see it, so whatever. You "didn't see" Kevin Eleven's jibes about suicide either even though your attention was drawn to it, thread and page number and all.