@kilroy70said And when it gets right down to it, you can't even be trusted with relatively innocuous statements... you're able to mangle nearly anything said, and in full view of everyone.
I haven't "mangled" anything or misrepresented the clear meaning of your words. As you say, it's still "in full view of everyone".
There is nothing in my posting history to suggest that I might exploit "misfortune" in your life, such as you having had relatives pass away, in order to declare it "forum gold".
There was nothing whatsoever "innocuous" about your posting starting at the top of page 32.
@fmfsaid I haven't "mangled" anything or misrepresented the clear meaning of your words. As you say, it's still "in full view of everyone".
There is nothing in my posting history to suggest that I might exploit "misfortune" in your life, such as you having had relatives pass away, in order to declare it "forum gold".
There was nothing whatsoever "innocuous" about your posting starting at the top of page 32.
Playing the same stupid victim card over and over won't work. You sound like a man trying to squelch his own guilty conscience.
It's all just good wholesome fun and jocular forum banter when you are on the attack, isn't it. But heaven forbid if someone comes after you, then it's unjustifiable insinuations.
@kilroy70said Playing the same stupid victim card over and over won't work. You sound like a man trying to squelch his own guilty conscience.
It's all just good wholesome fun and jocular forum banter when you are on the attack, isn't it. But heaven forbid if someone comes after you, then it's unjustifiable insinuations.
As I say, your insinuation that I might troll you about your relatives having died - and now also trying to insinuate that I have a "guilty conscience" - is wholly unjustified and does not constitute "fun and jocular forum banter" at all. Indeed, it's a pretty nasty brand of gaslighting.
@fmfsaid The references to Suzianne's reappearance have been frivolous and jocular. With your stuff insinuating that I might troll you about deceased relatives, you don't seem jocular at all. Indeed, your banter seems pretty unpleasant.
"The references to Suzianne's reappearance have been frivolous and jocular."
You're able to call them frivolous and jocular because you were not the target.
@kilroy70said "The references to Suzianne's reappearance have been frivolous and jocular."
You're able to call them frivolous and jocular because you were not the target.
I am able to call them frivolous and jocular because that's what they simply are. This thread is about how she has gone for good. I posted about how she obviously hasn't.
@kilroy70said I am not Gravedigger, and Gravedigger is not me.
No one cares who you are or were; your continued narcissistic pouting about people thinking you are a returning user is revealing of your Kevin Eleven style need for validation.
@kilroy70said It happens. People die. But I certainly know better than to provide details to a couple of unnamed bubble heads who will pry into and try making "forum gold" from the misfortune of others.
@kilroy70said Secondly, both you and divegeester managed to disrupt a conversation I was having with Kelly Jay on a topic I was interested in pursuing.
Oh poor you…did your once in a blue moon convo with KellyJay get interrupted by other people posting…
Only I am not laughing at the "Suzianne login fiasco", I am laughing at the total fool
that thinks this fiasco is an unbelievably significant part of anyone's life.
Get a life, for gawd's sake.
Do you mean a life like you flirting with Toruun in the Tavern thread where you pretend it’s a real place and the two of you are having real drinks…?
Or is the sort of life where you believe there are “aliens buzzing around in the earths atmosphere” and where you hang out on “unexplained mysteries” websites and chat with other saddos about conspiracies… is that the sort of “significant” life you lead?
Adieu
02 Feb '23 05:391 edit
Back to Top