30 May 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhat has he done, your friend? I must know that before I make up my mind.
Although not entirely true, let's assume you are a completely new person every 7 years (where all your cells have been replaced and regenerated). Would one therefore be able to claim that anything bad we did 7 years ago was not done by us?
Asking for a friend.
30 May 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidcellular replacement is quaint, but criminal memory, which resides in cellular memory, is passed down like dominant genes and thus impeaches forever
Although not entirely true, let's assume you are a completely new person every 7 years (where all your cells have been replaced and regenerated). Would one therefore be able to claim that anything bad we did 7 years ago was not done by us?
Asking for a friend.
now, this tiny lil unfortunate fact has never impeded my ability to deny any sort of involvement in the dastardly distractions to which i may, or may not, have been party too
i claim innocence on a daily basis
i claim blanket forgiveness for alleged infractions
i have a perpetual pardon in my pocket
i am immune to accusations of impropriety
even as the lil devil on my shoulder snickers and reminds me of that one time when - lol, "one" time
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29599
30 May 23
@torunn saidHe ate a mermaid.
What has he done, your friend? I must know that before I make up my mind.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidLike a biological reason for a statute of limitations?
Although not entirely true, let's assume you are a completely new person every 7 years (where all your cells have been replaced and regenerated). Would one therefore be able to claim that anything bad we did 7 years ago was not done by us?
Asking for a friend.
30 May 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI must say you have quite the imagination, like a Canadian would be friends with you. 🙂
He's Canadian.
-VR
@very-rusty saidDo you feel you are representative of all Canadians VR?
I must say you have quite the imagination, like a Canadian would be friends with you. 🙂
-VR
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI do that anyway.
Although not entirely true, let's assume you are a completely new person every 7 years (where all your cells have been replaced and regenerated). Would one therefore be able to claim that anything bad we did 7 years ago was not done by us?
Asking for a friend.
30 May 23
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNo, that tattoo was bad then and it’s still bad now, and it’s still yours.
Although not entirely true, let's assume you are a completely new person every 7 years (where all your cells have been replaced and regenerated). Would one therefore be able to claim that anything bad we did 7 years ago was not done by us?
Asking for a friend.
30 May 23
1 edit
@ghost-of-a-duke saidEven if this is true, our memories remain, so no.
Although not entirely true, let's assume you are a completely new person every 7 years (where all your cells have been replaced and regenerated). Would one therefore be able to claim that anything bad we did 7 years ago was not done by us?
Asking for a friend.
Although I wouldn't put it past some stupid person to claim this as a defense in a criminal case. Probably in America.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29599
30 May 23
@suzianne saidIn the year 2056, it will be possible to upgrade our brains and therefore legally distance ourselves from our previous crimes and choice of tattoos.
Even if this is true, our memories remain, so no.
Although I wouldn't put it past some stupid person to claim this as a defense in a criminal case. Probably in America.
30 May 23
@suzianne saidI wouldn’t put it past some lawyer who charges enormously inflated fees to try this defense. Probably in America.
Even if this is true, our memories remain, so no.
Although I wouldn't put it past some stupid person to claim this as a defense in a criminal case. Probably in America.