Go back
Banned post

Banned post

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
Ah, if you were talking about che@ing, that's likely to be the reason. Robomod (the program removing posts containing certain words) doesn't understand the context, and RHP-related che@ing accusations are not welcome in the forums, so it was programmed to remove posts containing the word "che@ing" or "che@er" (I think using it once is okay).

I don't think ...[text shortened]... t you can write the post again, trying to avoid words which you think might be a problem.
That's not true. I've been accused of cheating several times today because I admitted to using opening books. 😲

By one of my clan mates as well. 😠

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ian68
That's not true. I've been accused of cheating several times today because I admitted to using opening books. 😲

By one of my clan mates as well. 😠
Alert the posts, and they will be removed (it can take a while).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
Alert the posts, and they will be removed (it can take a while).
It's alright, it wasn't specifically directed at me, just everyone who uses books in general. The whole thread is quite funny actually, things just wouldn't sink in no matter how many times they were explained. 😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ian68
It's alright, it wasn't specifically directed at me, just everyone who uses books in general. The whole thread is quite funny actually, things just wouldn't sink in no matter how many times they were explained. 😀
Oh, I see, you are in the same clan as TragicBrain. 😉 Actually he did have a post or several removed because of a che@ing accusation. I don't think general accusations like "anyone who uses books is a che@er" usually get removed (unless, of course, they contain the wrong words and get robomodded).

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ian68
It's alright, it wasn't specifically directed at me, just everyone who uses books in general. The whole thread is quite funny actually, things just wouldn't sink in no matter how many times they were explained. 😀
Using books and game notes are acceptable for correspondence chess, and have been so, for as long as it has been played. Databases are another acceptable tool for correspondence chess. It sounds like you are hanging with some real brains there Ian old buddy. 😉

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ian68
It's alright, it wasn't specifically directed at me, just everyone who uses books in general. The whole thread is quite funny actually, things just wouldn't sink in no matter how many times they were explained. 😀
The post should still have been alerted.

I'll put my 2 cents in the forum, but as a moderator I do not like to alert things.

P-

Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Plonkerism 101 being taught by a Plonker PHD.