@very-rusty saidHow have things changed "big time" in recent years?
How so what Andy?,finish your thought!
-VR
@handyandy saidI didn't say recent years? Where did you get that from?
How have things changed "big time" in recent years?
-VR
@very-rusty saidOne cannot win a debate against her because one cannot have a debate with her. Whenever she is outboxed by a better argument or contradicted by factual evidence, she responds by name calling. But instead of calling her interlocutors morons (actually a term of endearment over in the Clans forum), she calls them racists and/or sexists. This allows her to imagine that, having been driven off the logical field of debate, she has seized the moral high ground. It fails, of course; argument ad hominem is a logical fallacy. She routinely employs it when cornered. Not a sound debating method and certainly not a member of my dream team.
Just admit you can't win a debate with her.
She really doesn't want anyone's help Suzie Q.
goad also talks to people like they are inferior to him. I don't hear/see you say anything about that.
I personally like that she stands on her own two feet and not behind anyone.
Or put anyone on the GBaway script like some people do, I wont mention any names but we bot ...[text shortened]... oticed but you don't talk to people you don't like very nicely either! MR Buttinski....LOL...
-VR
- Joined
- 11 Nov 14
- Moves
- 38428
1 edit
@moonbus saidYes, moonbus.
One cannot win a debate against her because one cannot have a debate with her. Whenever she is outboxed by a better argument or contradicted by factual evidence, she responds by name calling. But instead of calling her interlocutors morons (actually a term of endearment over in the Clans forum), she calls them racists and/or sexists. This allows her to imagine that, h ...[text shortened]... y employs it when cornered. Not a sound debating method and certainly not a member of my dream team.
Also, when 'painted into a corner' (out argued, or pulled up for an erroneous post by her/his self), D64 adapts the well known, but hardly strong, debating stance of 'putting the head in the sand and hoping the nasty man goes away', ie, totally ignoring all questions relating to their error.
There have been several occasions when I have been countered by this 'debating' method by D64.
@blood-on-the-tracks saidSo bott isn't a big fan either!
Yes, moonbus.
Also, when 'painted into a corner' (out argued, or pulled up for an erroneous post by her/his self), D64 adapts the well known, but hardly strong, debating stance of 'putting the head in the sand and hoping the nasty man goes away', ie, totally ignoring all questions relating to their error.
There have been several occasions when I have been countered by this 'debating' method by D64.
-VR
- Joined
- 11 Nov 14
- Moves
- 38428
@Very-Rusty
Well, D64 certainly wouldn't be on my strongest debating team from this site.
Feel free to point out where my post above is inaccurate.
I have several examples that I can point any interested readers to.
@very-rusty saidIt’s gone midnight here. I’ll sleep on it and get back to you with candidates tomorrow. G’night.
So who would you have on team moonbus?
Friends on here?
-VR
@blood-on-the-tracks saidI just said you weren't a big fan either.
@Very-Rusty
Well, D64 certainly wouldn't be on my strongest debating team from this site.
Feel free to point out where my post above is inaccurate.
I have several examples that I can point any interested readers to.
-VR
@very-rusty saidOne, I didn't say she needed help.
Just admit you can't win a debate with her.
She really doesn't want anyone's help Suzie Q.
goad also talks to people like they are inferior to him. I don't hear/see you say anything about that.
I personally like that she stands on her own two feet and not behind anyone.
Or put anyone on the GBaway script like some people do, I wont mention any names but we bot ...[text shortened]... oticed but you don't talk to people you don't like very nicely either! MR Buttinski....LOL...
-VR
Two, the Ghost does not talk down to people unless, like her, they are overly aggressive, or like you, they are overly stupid.
Hey, I wasn't rude to you by calling you Mr. Buttinski, that was more respectful and factual than you deserve.
- Joined
- 11 Nov 14
- Moves
- 38428
@Very-Rusty
Sorry, Rusty. I had you as a supporter of D64 from scan reading the thread.
Apologies
You are correct. Another who is not a fan!
1 edit
@suzianne saidYes goad does talk down to people. Even said he is superior don't you follow the forums?
One, I didn't say she needed help.
Two, the Ghost does not talk down to people unless, like her, they are overly aggressive, or like you, they are overly stupid.
Hey, I wasn't rude to you by calling you Mr. Buttinski, that was more respectful and factual than you deserve.
You're a hypocrite same as him talking about other people name calling where you do the same thing. I am not name calling being truthful.
I deserve as much respect as anyone else in the forums.
She certainly doesn't need any help with you Suzie Q, we both know that!
-VR
@blood-on-the-tracks saidOH I do appreciate how she stands up for herself.
@Very-Rusty
Sorry, Rusty. I had you as a supporter of D64 from scan reading the thread.
Apologies
You are correct. Another who is not a fan!
I am not really a fan of anyone, there are those I have respect for. I believe there is a difference there.
-VR