Rob, could you please shut up? I mean, seriously, you provide
some laughs and stuff, every once in a while and mostly involuntary
ones, but you and I are in the same basket of buffoonish
RHP entertainment, being watched by the zoo attendants (aka other
posters) with a mix of disgust, pity and laughter.
Divegeester is, in the contrary, a smart guy who, whether some
like his view or not, is a stand up guy, who calls a spade a spade,
and an asset to the spirituality, sports, culture and general forum.
What are you known for? For being a vermin on the clan forum and
a cheater at chess challenges (I don't say that and frankly don't
care) And I don't say this with hatred but with brotherly sympathy,
as I am known as an unpredictable, scatological mad clown.
So, please just shut up and stop embarrassing yourself. Dive is a
better guy than you and I put together. Have some dignity and
let's go back to being buffoons. It doesn't fit you to try to be
taken seriously.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat do you mean?
not proven but true? what sorcery is this?
Something is either true or it isn't. The ability to prove this has no bearing on this.
I have simply expressed the view that I believe that Grampy Bobby did what he was accused of. If he wants to challenge this, he can.
Originally posted by Rank outsiderthe opposite of a truth is not always a falsehood...
What do you mean?
Something is either true or it isn't. The ability to prove this has no bearing on this.
I have simply expressed the view that I believe that Grampy Bobby did what he was accused of. If he wants to challenge this, he can.
sometimes the opposite of a truth is another truth...
- somebody real wise and prolly famous to boot
Originally posted by SeitseFirst of all, this is a public forum and you have no jurisdiction here to tell anyone to do anything. Divesjeester holds others to standards that evidently he himself cannot adhere to and spends inordinate amounts of his time here castigating and hypocritically moralising over other people. I resent your use of the term vermin to describe anyone including me. If I embarrass myself its has no relevance to anyone but me. I am not a cheat nor have I ever cheated. I resent your use of the term cheat to describe me personally. I resent your cheap shots at my religion too. Your entire text is nothing more than an opinion piece masquerading as some kind of fact. If anyone needs to shad-up-a-their-face its you, Comprehende amigo? good.
Rob, could you please shut up? I mean, seriously, you provide
some laughs and stuff, every once in a while and mostly involuntary
ones, but [b]you and I are in the same basket of buffoonish
RHP entertainment, being watched by the zoo attendants (aka other
posters) with a mix of disgust, pity and laughter.
Divegeester is, in the contrary, ...[text shortened]... dignity and
let's go back to being buffoons. It doesn't fit you to try to be
taken seriously.[/b]
Originally posted by Rank outsideryes it is but you have provided no evidence that its true other than to say its true because I believe it to be true. A logically fallacious appeal to your own authority.
What do you mean?
Something is either true or it isn't. The ability to prove this has no bearing on this.
I have simply expressed the view that I believe that Grampy Bobby did what he was accused of. If he wants to challenge this, he can.
2 edits
Originally posted by Keggewow surely you can be more imaginative and creative than you're an idiot? seriously i refuse to believe anyone is that dull. have you tried a thesaurus? yes Effhim did not lie, but meh it was looking hopeful at first.
You must be by far the biggest idiot around here after you confirmed fmf did not lie at all! And yet you try again.
Originally posted by rookie54Not sure what that has to do with what I said.....but.....
the opposite of a truth is not always a falsehood...
sometimes the opposite of a truth is another truth...
- somebody real wise and prolly famous to boot
But can give an example of something which is a truth, the opposite of which is not a falsehood?
- Joined
- 23 Nov 09
- Moves
- 146507
Originally posted by StartreaderTo others you ate the bully.
With two evident and proven bullies as your witnesses and no link leading to the object of your complaint your proposition is unconvincing.
Clearly something has distressed you and I'm sorry to see that, as probably Grampy Bobby and Robbie are, but they don't get a chance to voice any empathy publicly because you keep having a go at them.
Again, I ...[text shortened]... give it some time, and then consider whether you might not have got the wrong end of the stick?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieOh dear. You clearly don't understand the difference between evidence and proof.
yes it is but you have provided no evidence that its true other than to say its true because I believe it to be true. A logically fallacious appeal to your own authority.
I have evidence. I don't have proof.
