Go back
FireFox and RHP

FireFox and RHP

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mikelom
But, as Rag suggested, cleaning up and cookie conflictions etc is much more of a chore!
It's never happened to me.

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

Importing cookies and favourites does not mean that FF and IE share cookies/files/folders after installation. I always say no - do not import any cookies or settings from IE.

You will note that the site has been tested with a recent version of FF 2.0xx and you are linking/using FF 0.9. It could be that uzless is also that ignorent as yourself. 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ludz
Importing cookies and favourites does not mean that FF and IE share cookies/files/folders after installation. I always say no - do not import any cookies or settings from IE.

You will note that the site has been tested with a recent version of FF 2.0xx and you are linking/using FF 0.9. It could be that uzless is also that ignorent as yourself. 🙂
Who said that cookies are shared? Why don't you just make up my posts in future if that's what floats your boat?

It was a quick search. Do you honestly expect me to find the page referring to the latest version of FF when everybody (who knows anything) knows that the latest version of FF can also import cookies from IE. Everybody (who knows anything) also knows that IE cookies aren't standards compliant so there may be issues with using the imported ones in FF.

Well done on saying no to importing cookies. How do you know that uzless does the same? Remember that this thread was started by somebody looking for help. Also, if you care to browse through the Help forum on here, you'll find multiple threads asking the same question as uzless. The answer has always been that there is a cookie conflict and the solution has been to clear the cookies in both browsers.

BTW: It's ignorant.

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak

BTW: It's ignorant.

D
So am I! 😏😏

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ludz
Some of you are going overboard. Firefox has nothing to do with Google. It is just a browser. Different search engines can be accessed by any browser like IE, FF , Opera.

I suspect that uzless who started the thread was being mischievous.
No I wasn't. I couldn't log in and asked for help.

I don't find Browser wars to be funny.

Do you like Kirk or Picard?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
Who said that cookies are shared? Why don't you just make up my posts in future if that's what floats your boat?

It was a quick search. Do you honestly expect me to find the page referring to the latest version of FF when everybody (who knows anything) knows that the latest version of FF can also import cookies from IE. Everybody (who knows anything) ...[text shortened]... nd the solution has been to clear the cookies in both browsers.

BTW: It's ignorant.

D
I did go through couple of pages in the help forums but didn't see a firefox one.

I'll clear both browsers cookies and see what happens.

thanks for the help!

Vote Up
Vote Down

nerds.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
nerds.
Hey WW, do you have a finn oven? You might call it by a different name...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masonry_heater

D

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Ragnorak
Hey WW, do you have a finn oven? You might call it by a different name...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masonry_heater

D
not in this flat, but I used to live in one that had three of them. a lot of the old buildings (early 20th century and before) have them, but often they're not functioning anymore.

you really call it a finnish stove? we call it a kachelofen, or 'kaakeliuuni' in finnish.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
not in this flat, but I used to live in one that had three of them. a lot of the old buildings (early 20th century and before) have them, but often they're not functioning anymore.

you really call it a finnish stove? we call it a kachelofen, or 'kaakeliuuni' in finnish.
I associate those things to the Roman or the Ottoman empire. 😕

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by wormwood
nerds.
who farted?

Vote Up
Vote Down

FF has never worked properly for me. I have reinstalled it several times and its always the same rot. And I also ask, do you gain any significant use with FF?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Evil Pawn 666
FF has never worked properly for me. I have reinstalled it several times and its always the same rot. And I also ask, do you gain any significant use with FF?
On this site it makes a very significant difference* - elsewhere it's just much better.

[*with the greasemonkey stuff/extensions]

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

duplicate - plz delete

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FabianFnas
The reason I don't want IE and FF at the same computer is the same as not having Linux and MS Windows in the same computer. I did that experiment once and I had ultimately to reinstall windows again and start from the beginning. I think (correct me if I'm wrong) that windows heavily relies of IE and if you tamper with this, then you might be in trouble.
...[text shortened]... pts would work in IE too, or if RHP would be rewritten with similar functionality included.
I have never heard of Windows relying heavily on IE. In fact, I have uninstalled IE from this computer with no problems. I only use FF on it. It runs on XP. The other computer, with Vista, has both FF and IE, because I haven't gotten around to uninstalling the IE. The problems I have with it are because Vista is crap. It doesn't like OpenOffice and so OO tends to freeze at times when a document or spreadsheet is open. On both, FF is set as the default browser.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.