03 Jul '20 08:10>
@uglytoproll saidMaxwell or the Prince?
Death by "suicide"
Maybe both?
@divegeester saidThe types of evidence their claiming to have is pretty airtight, ranging from eye witness, victim statements to travel documents phone calls etc,
With Epstine dead she will definitely throw him further under the bus and yes she will totally play the victim card. I have no idea how good the case is against her, have you sen the evidence?
PS Yes I did mean “quell”.
@wolfgang59 saidIn German "Quelle" is source, something to do with that?
Really?
How do you quell waters?
Definition of quell
(Entry 1 of 2)
transitive verb
1 : to thoroughly overwhelm and reduce to submission or passivity quell a riot
2 : quiet, pacify quell fears
@kevcvs57 saidHow can a “type” of evidence be “airtight”.
The types of evidence their claiming to have is pretty airtight, ranging from eye witness, victim statements to travel documents phone calls etc,
She’s going down one way or another but clearly someone at the top wants this blown wide open otherwise she wouldn’t have ‘been taken alive’ it’s a lot easier to fake a suicide outside of maxImum security.
@divegeester saidWell eyewitness is unlikely to Change, phone records and travel documentation definitely won’t change.
How can a “type” of evidence be “airtight”.
Have you seen this evidence and are somehow able to prejudge the outcome?
@kevcvs57 saidI don’t think anyone is “lying”, what an odd trajectory you are taking. I’m responding to your claim that the evidence they have is “airtight”.
Well eyewitness is unlikely to Change, phone records and travel documentation definitely won’t change.
No unfortunately I’m not privy to the FBIs evidence locker but that’s what they claim to have, do you think they are lying, and if so why?
@divegeester saidBut you don’t think eye / victim witness accounts, travel documentation and phone records are air tight and why did you ask if I had seen this evidence ( ridiculous in itself ) if you were sure the FBI weren’t lying?
I don’t think anyone is “lying”, what an odd trajectory you are taking. I’m responding to your claim that the evidence they have is “airtight”.
@divegeester saidOK ... a new definition of "quell" ... please submit to OED etc.
Same you would “quieten” them.
@divegeester saidWhy do you think she will be not guilty due to “lack of sufficient evidence”?
How can a “type” of evidence be “airtight”.
Have you seen this evidence and are somehow able to prejudge the outcome?
@earl-of-trumps saidMakes you wonder how they managed to arrest a Mossad agent and why she didn’t skip town to Israel, over confidence perhaps.
The deal Epstein got in his Florida conviction shows just how much power
he has, due to the connections he has. He should have gotten 50 years,
for cripe's sake.
(Acosta is the District Attorney)
[i]Acosta later said he offered a lenient plea deal because he was told that Epstein "belonged to intelligence", was "above his pay grade" and to "leave it alone".[48 ...[text shortened]... d. So does Ghislaine.
You have a long way to go in getting Maxwell, because she is Intel as well.
@earl-of-trumps saidMossad 😂
The deal Epstein got in his Florida conviction shows just how much power
he has, due to the connections he has. He should have gotten 50 years,
for cripe's sake.
(Acosta is the District Attorney)
[i]Acosta later said he offered a lenient plea deal because he was told that Epstein "belonged to intelligence", was "above his pay grade" and to "leave it alone".[48 ...[text shortened]... d. So does Ghislaine.
You have a long way to go in getting Maxwell, because she is Intel as well.
@kevcvs57 saidI haven’t see the evidence so I couldn’t possibly claim to know whether or not it was “airtight” as you seen to know. Perhaps you have access to the FBI files, I don’t know.
But you don’t think eye / victim witness accounts, travel documentation and phone records are air tight and why did you ask if I had seen this evidence ( ridiculous in itself ) if you were sure the FBI weren’t lying?