Originally posted by z00tSeems to mate, that you are making a cheating accusation, whatever you say. I have no idea what the background of this is, but reading your blog is quite clearly an accusation of cheating.
You are the one who needs to get to grips with the situation. You have falsely accused me of conducting a witch-hunt and making cheating accusations which I haven't. Nobody is going to bat an eyelid if you express an opinion i.e. the Grob or the King Gambit is better than opening Y or Z.
However if you attempt to distort well known chess truths and then cove ...[text shortened]... computer moves. However the author of those claims retracted them and that is now behind us.
You can say you're not accusing anyone of cheating as often and as loud and on as many channels as you like, but that does not alter the fact that you are, actually, making a cheating accusation
Originally posted by knightwestThis is the free world you know, you have to be taken to task for your comments. Or are you denying that the comments were made? What is the difference had a 1200 player claimed he could see tactics faster than Fritz or that his friend can match 9 moves with Fritz and the 10th is better?
Seems to mate, that you are making a cheating accusation, whatever you say. I have no idea what the background of this is, but reading your blog is quite clearly an accusation of cheating.
You can say you're not accusing anyone of cheating as often and as loud and on as many channels as you like, but that does not alter the fact that you are, actually, making a cheating accusation
It is nearly 10 years since Rebel beat Anand in a speed chess match, so claiming that untitled humans can outdo GM plus progs is laughable. Just think about it ....
