4 edits
Originally posted by FMFOriginally posted by Grampy Bobby (Page 2)
You can't possibly say this has nothing to do with Russ, Grampy Bobby. On page 2 you said: " In due time, serious critique (would be produced) which evaluates and summarizes viable suggestions for Russ to consider" and then a little later "Hopefully [Russ'll] see this thread."
Was your suggestion [that you would/he should [b]..."retain a rep guidelines and terms of service"] a "viable suggestion" for Russ to consider, do you think?[/b]
My thanks to each of you who understand the unstated brain storming dynamic embedded within this thread: 1) First, off the wall repartee to stimulate the creative thinking of others; and 2) In due time, serious critique which evaluates and summarizes viable suggestions for Russ to consider."
______________________
Please read before you reply and if or when you do reply "quote responsibly"; persistent gratuitous use of site nicknames defines you and your intent.
1 edit
-Removed-26 Jun '08 11:15 / 1 edit
If you were Russ...
"If you were Russ and/or Chris, how would you approach short and long term resolution of RHP Site moderation issues?
One simple courtesy request: Please find other sandboxes to jest, fixate and fight in. Only thoughtful replies go here.
Thanks."
______________________________
Note: Amazing; it's the same focus over seven years ago. Thanks for bringing this fourteen page June, 2008, thread back to life.
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThe majority of the problem posts are generated by nonsubs who are clearly not here to play chess. Moderation of these problems has been and remains an abysmal failure.
26 Jun '08 11:15 / 1 edit
[b]If you were Russ...
"If you were Russ and/or Chris, how would you approach short and long term resolution of RHP Site moderation issues?
1. Limiting access to forums to subscribers would only mitigate not eliminate the problem.
2. Eliminating the forums entirely would be like "throwing the baby out with the bath water".
3. Ban the problem posters permanently would require moderation which this site lacks.
4. Recognize that continued problems of this sort can only lead to a negative effect on the bottom line and the reputation of the site. After all, the problem nonsubs contribute only to a negative atmosphere in the forums.
5. If I were Russ and/or Chris I would seriously consider finding a buyer for this site. I would be concerned for the karmatic repercussions of continuing on in this negative situation.
Originally posted by caissad4Have you made Russ aware of these five observations?
The majority of the problem posts are generated by nonsubs who are clearly not here to play chess. Moderation of these problems has been and remains an abysmal failure.
1. Limiting access to forums to subscribers would only mitigate not eliminate the problem.
2. Eliminating the forums entirely would be like "throwing the baby out with the bath water".
3. Ba ...[text shortened]... te. I would be concerned for the karmatic repercussions of continuing on in this negative situation.