18 Sep '15 05:20>
Originally posted by Grampy Bobbyoh yes let's hope!
Hopefully he'll see this thread; if not, C'est la vie.....
[claps hands]
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemI support most of what you suggested.
I'd have real chess 960, with separate ratings and castling.
I'd have automatic forum tracking of threads I've posted in, and the option to track other threads of interest to me.
Clans would each have a team rating and that would be used to rank them for the year, along with a weighting rewarding greater activity.
The forums would have a robu ...[text shortened]... .)
I'd have automated cheat detection via engine match up, and boot the guilty off the site!!
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWould you pick a lawyer who specialized in law suits inhibiting freedom of speech and reducing diversity?
I'd retain a reputable law firm to review the desirability of including a brief statement
regarding an expectation of civility in my forum guidelines and terms of service
Originally posted by FMF..... "a reputable law firm" which represents both claimants and defendants respects "freedom of speech" as well as "diversity" of opinion;
Would you pick a lawyer who specialized in law suits inhibiting freedom of speech and reducing diversity?
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhose notion of "civility" would you like to impose on this message board?
..... "a reputable law firm" which represents both claimants and defendants respects "freedom of speech" as well as "diversity" of opinion...
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemI agree with this, chess960 is a great chess variant.
I'd have real chess 960, with separate ratings and castling.
I'd have automatic forum tracking of threads I've posted in, and the option to track other threads of interest to me.
Clans would each have a team rating and that would be used to rank them for the year, along with a weighting rewarding greater activity.
The forums would have a robu ...[text shortened]... .)
I'd have automated cheat detection via engine match up, and boot the guilty off the site!!
Originally posted by FMFRuss has already retained*** "lawyers" who provide him with valuable counsel and advice to safeguard this website from the risk of litigation as does Facebook and other social media. The title of this thread is "If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn..."; therefore, what you or I or any other mother's son or daughter contributing to this online public forum thread would do is the salient and only issue being discussed; neither Russ nor his "lawyers" are in the least involved in these proceedings. The only focal point is what would you do if "You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn?
Whose notion of "civility" would you like to impose on this message board?
Why would lawyers need to draw it up?
Who or what - in your mind - would be "defendants" in this matter? Do you envisage some sort of proceedings against them.
Have you contacted Russ about the idea of him hiring lawyers in response to what you perceive is going on on the forums?
Would you propose some sort of legal exemption for the Clans Forum?
Originally posted by SchlecterI agree as well. Another consideration is that 960 games which are all by definition
I agree with this, chess960 is a great chess variant.
And many people in RHP like to play in that way
So implementing a right castling right now will be very helpful
Now in my case If I were the owner....
I am thinking about free features for non-suscriber:
so a free ladder of 3 days
many open tournaments for both subscribers and non-suscribers (1 or 2 / month)
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyYou can't possibly say this has nothing to do with Russ, Grampy Bobby. On page 2 you said: " In due time, serious critique (would be produced) which evaluates and summarizes viable suggestions for Russ to consider" and then a little later "Hopefully [Russ'll] see this thread."
[W]hat you or I or any other mother's son or daughter contributing to this online public forum thread would do is the salient and only issue being discussed; neither Russ nor his "lawyers" are in the least involved in these proceedings. The only focal point is what would you do if "[b]You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn?[/b]