If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn...

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
My pleasure as always; and I for one am pleased that you're beginning to regain your objective focus.

Grampy Bobby, my "objective focus" is aimed directly at your pompous, over-weening hypocrisy.

Originally posted by divegeester
Grampy Bobby, my "objective focus" is aimed directly at your pompous, over-weening hypocrisy.

Once again thank you; this reply coming from you is tantamount to an intentional public compliment.
Seems you've acquired FMF's penchant for the gratuitous use of site nicknames in your replies.

Have a "silly humour" forum.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
... this reply coming from you is tantamount to an intentional public compliment.

I obviously didn't make myself clear.

Originally posted by Ponderable
Have a "silly humour" forum.

Great Idea!

Thanks, Ponderable.

Originally posted by divegeester
Grampy Bobby, my "objective focus" is aimed directly at your pompous, over-weening hypocrisy.

"Request: Please remain focused on the thread's topic and objective." (OP)

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby to divegeester
"Request: Please remain focused on the thread's topic and objective." (OP)

The post that your message above is in reply to is 38 days old and you'd already made a retort to the exact same message once back then. Why have you bumped it to the top of the thread list unprompted?

Originally posted by FMF
The post that your message above is in reply to is 38 days old and you'd already made a retort to the exact same message once back then. Why have you bumped it to the top of the thread list unprompted?

Because of its relevance to today. That's why.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Because of its relevance to today. That's why.

Are you retro-trolling Grampy bobby? 😉

Originally posted by FMF
The post that your message above is in reply to is 38 days old and you'd already made a retort to the exact same message once back then. Why have you bumped it to the top of the thread list unprompted?

When one has a penchant for bumping ones own threads, it is advisable to have a 'mark' to play against.

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
[b]If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn

"If You Personally Owned Red Hot Pawn" what if any changes
would you make to its present policies governing:

1) "Subscriptions"
2) "Rating Tables"
3) "Forums"
4) "Clans"
5) "Clubs"

6) "Chess Blogs"
7) "Send Feedback"
8) "Site FAQ"
9) "Help Forum"
10) "Site Map"

11) "On Twitter"
12) "On Fa ...[text shortened]... future?
____________

Request: Please remain focused on the thread's topic and objective.[/b]

mmm if i owned the site i would
1] let cumputor cheats play with out hassle
2] close popular forums
3] let players sandbag
4] let players have multiple accounts, money talks
5] ignore pms when someone complains not even reply


ooops...seems like my ideas are already in use

Originally posted by divegeester
Are you retro-trolling Grampy bobby? 😉

^------------------------------------------------------------> Thread 165496

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
^------------------------------------------------------------> Thread 165496

I'll take that as an avoidance of the question

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Because of its relevance to today. That's why.

You mean people expressing their objection to "your pompous, over-weening hypocrisy" is still relevant today ~ 38 days later?

Originally posted by roma45
mmm if i owned the site i would
1] let cumputor cheats play with out hassle
2] close popular forums
3] let players sandbag
4] let players have multiple accounts, money talks
5] ignore pms when someone complains not even reply


ooops...seems like my ideas are already in use

Sorry Roma. Beat you to that one. I sent in a PM around 12 months ago suggesting all those 5 points. Such is my respect by the administrators that they were adopted immediately except for the popular forum one. After a bit of foot dragging and begging (on their part) I put my foot down and said it must go. So here we are.