Originally posted by Daemon SinGood!
Thankfully, responding to complaints about the sentencing, the Attorney General has stepped into to review the case. With any luck they'll all get proper sentences.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7840339.stm
However, the review board need to be incredibly correct or they will likely get done for racism! I bet you not! 😉
Originally posted by mikelomMikelom:
Neither had I until just now.
But one thing I did guess correctly! Was the colour of the perpetrators before I opened the link!
I wonder why that is?.... 😲😲
Shock horror..... do me for......ism. ye right! !
Edit: I mean come on, it's just not a cool snowflake crime is it! 😛
- Always treats his wife kindly
- Never drank alcohol
- Does not judge people by the colour of their skin.
What a nice person!
Originally posted by mikelomCongratulations, here's your medal for guessing correctly: http://tinyurl.com/77bnzm
Neither had I until just now.
But one thing I did guess correctly! Was the colour of the perpetrators before I opened the link!
I wonder why that is?.... 😲😲
Shock horror..... do me for......ism. ye right! !
Edit: I mean come on, it's just not a cool snowflake crime is it! 😛
Careful placing it around your neck!
The post that was quoted here has been removedOverly harsh?
Is that why it is under review for sentence extensions for leniency?
Irrelevant of the colour of the perpetrators, the sentencing was abismal for such a heinous crime, involving a girl who had the mental age of an eight and was then subsequently scarred further after her initial physical ordeals.
Originally posted by mikelomWe can safely conclude it's your first option, eh CFT?
Overly harsh?
Is that why it is under review for sentence extensions for leniency?
Irrelevant of the colour of the perpetrators, the sentencing was abismal for such a heinous crime, involving a girl who had the mental age of an eight and was then subsequently scarred further after her initial physical ordeals.