Go back
Medieval Diplomacy Strategy

Medieval Diplomacy Strategy

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by catfoodtim
Sybaritic maybe, suicidal no chance.

My preference for Aragon? ...his head stuck on a pole outside Savoy if the truth be know.


Dark Lord brings to mind crushing peasants skulls with your bare fists. and shouting.

Witch King brings to mind entrails, cages and screaming.
You are a fool of a Took twice over. Now you have no income. How do you propose to pay the upkeep on your remaining army? Beg for alms?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
This week's Power Ratings:

1. Saxony 1
2. Golden Horde 2
3. Bavaria 5
4. Hungary 3
5. Sicily 4
6. Venice 10
7. France 6
8. Aragon 8
9. Roum 7
10. Poland 14
11. Morocco 12
12. Castile 9
13. Norway 16
14. Mamulukes 11
15. Lithuania 15
16. Byzantine 13
17. Acquitaine 20
18. Denmark 17
19. England 18
20. Teutonic 22 ...[text shortened]... l their main forces to Bavaria's aid). I smell a rat and may e-mail the GM for an explanation.
Gee, would not have anything do do with a bargan struck with the new ruler to aid him with the Teutons in return..... Hmmm...


Ya know that DIPLOMACY thing is a big part of this game.... Helps to talk to people and not threaten them. A lot can be accomplishes on yahoo messenger is 30 minutes.

EDIT: By all means, go a talk to the GM. Please do. Accuse me a cheating now... make that final insult to my person.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Sorry, cant help but comment more on this now...

You can have a large army of Sicilians in a 32 gold province and I cant grant access to a force to move through my 21 gold province?

What kind of BS is that? Who the *@#*%!!! are you to say what can be done and what cant be?

You have gone beyond your "so called" "in game" insulting.

Ya know what....I will report it to the GM myself, but I doubt that you will like the result.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
Poland got a new player supposedly unknown to everybody on RHP and was promptly apparently granted full passage rights to all Bavarian territory including moving an army into a 21 gold empty province (and naturally moving all their main forces to Bavaria's aid). I smell a rat and may e-mail the GM for an explanation.
You reek too much. There's nothing in it. That's why it's called Medieval Diplomacy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
(and naturally moving all their main forces to Bavaria's aid)
Naturally, you are neglecting to mention that he has just used whatever funds he had to build a bigger badder army in Warsaw, or did you miss the 18 new troops there?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KnightWulfe
What kind of BS is that? Who the *@#*%!!! are you to say what can be done and what cant be? You have gone beyond your "so called" "in game" insulting.
He didn't mention you by name.

Well, it looks like the Poles really have done some stirring!

Vote Up
Vote Down

I think it's quite possible KW would stoop to cheating; he already attempted to get me removed from the game by complaining to the GM. He seems to have some sort of a psychotic fixation. The AgeofGames page specifically mentions that things of this nature have occurred before.

I find it bizarre that a player would grant full passage to his realm to somebody who just entered the game including allowing the other player to enter his capital city which is undefended. Unlike the situation between the Republic and Sicily there was no necessity to do such a thing; there was no threat to Ratisbon. If this new player had chosen to, he could have marched in this turn while cancelling the alliance and declared war next turn in which case he would have had Bavaria's heartland without a fight. Only a complete fool or a cheat would have done such a thing. Which are you, KW? And what assistance did you send up to help the Poles against the Teutons?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KnightWulfe
Naturally, you are neglecting to mention that he has just used whatever funds he had to build a bigger badder army in Warsaw, or did you miss the 18 new troops there?
So what?? They couldn't move this turn! You're really giving some lame excuses.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
I think it's quite possible KW would stoop to cheating; he already attempted to get me removed from the game by complaining to the GM. He seems to have some sort of a psychotic fixation. The AgeofGames page specifically mentions that things of this nature have occurred before.

I find it bizarre that a player would grant full passage to his real ...[text shortened]... Which are you, KW? And what assistance did you send up to help the Poles against the Teutons?
I complained to the GM becuase YOU stooped to personal insults. and after being repeatedly asked to stop, you kept on about it. That was the end of it.

Now you accuse me of cheating. Not only an insult, but a slam to my honour.

What I did to get Poland to help me is none of your concern, nor is how or when I repay the favor. I will not discuss it here.

You are just bitching and whining because it spells the end of your reign.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by no1marauder
So what?? They couldn't move this turn! You're really giving some lame excuses.
Please...PLEASE explain the necessity of them moving.

Do you know the state of his nation? Do you know the alliances he has? Do you know with whom he wars?

Please do tell.... what NEED does he have to move them? You are so full of it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

From the AgeofGames site:

Secondly, please do not try to hack files, send in bogus turnfiles for someone else, and the like. Our system is designed to detect and handle this, but we are all probably better off without those few dishonorable desperados out there that resort to such means 🙂.
Lastly, the most important rule: You can control ONLY ONE position per game. In the PBeM community, it is considered really bad sportsmanship to try to cheat by having more than one game position. Noone likes a bad sport! So, if we find out this rule has been broken (and we will monitor suspicious activity), the perpetrator will be removed, and permanently barred from all future games.

I will report this "suspicious activity" as I am entitled to. If you're found out to be a cheat, you should be banned. BTW, tyou're the one who used the word "cheat"; got a guilty conscience?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KnightWulfe
Please...PLEASE explain the necessity of them moving.

Do you know the state of his nation? Do you know the alliances he has? Do you know with whom he wars?

Please do tell.... what NEED does he have to move them? You are so full of it.
He couldn't move them; that's the point. I said "he" moved all his main forces to your aid and you said "What about his army in Warsaw?" Well, "he" couldn't move that one! I'm sure it will be on it's way next turn.

Vote Up
Vote Down

OK...let's not foul up the thread...it'll all come out in the wash...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Hey, this is all I said:

I smell a rat and may e-mail the GM for an explanation.

Look at the hysterical response! HMMMMMMM.......

Vote Up
Vote Down

The sneak attack into arkangelski worked 🙄
Lol, that's pretty embarassing. A single villager conscript taking a province of decent worth.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.