Originally posted by no1marauderBeeeeeeeeep - We're sorry, the number you have dialed is not in service. Check the number and please try again.
Go ahead and post there and stop whining about how I posted. I'd luvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv to see the other game players hear your ridiculous non-explanation; I doubt that they will be as thick as Suzianne, BuffaloBill and ATY.
Speaking of giving "only one side of the story" where's the contents of the e-mail you sent the GM?
And my b ...[text shortened]... g sources of your state law for a personal matter of yours, wasn't it? Hypocritical jerk.
And this, from your supposed email to the GM, since none of us actually saw the actual email in question, just what you posted here:
"I have an inquiry regarding the above captioned game. A new player, billjarrell, entered the game last turn (turn 8) as Poland."
Aren't we on Turn 8 right now? Wasn't last turn Turn 7?
EDIT: Bah, it seems that I can't count... well, it's Friday, that must be it.
Originally posted by SuzianneThe turn that was just turned in was turn 8. We received the current email list after turning in turn 7.
And this, from your supposed email to the GM, since none of us actually saw the actual email in question, just what you posted here:
"I have an inquiry regarding the above captioned game. A new player, billjarrell, entered the game last turn (turn 8) as Poland."
Aren't we on Turn 8 right now? Wasn't last turn Turn 7?
EDIT: Bah, it seems that I can't count... well, it's Friday, that must be it.
Originally posted by SuzianneWho said they didn't, Princess DimWit? Only a sub-cretin would take my post to mean that they had no dealings before THE TURN; I was obviously anticipating that someone would suggest (as someone did) that the two parties knew each other from a previous GAME (or outside the game).
Again, your continued meaningless tirade misses (or rather "evades" ) the point. You mean they've never heard of such a thing in another game *under the conditions as you posted them*. You completely failed to include the fact that Bavaria and Poland DID get together and plan their first turn together. Given this fact, you have no point about Bavaria let ...[text shortened]... into the shape you want, and soon, NO one will believe anything you say... even Sicily...)
Just because you can't understand my point due to your extreme lack of intelligence, doesn't mean there isn't one. Even your God KW tried to come up with an explanation initially:
Gee, would not have anything do do with a bargan struck with the new ruler to aid him with the Teutons in return..... Hmmm...
Of course, NONE of Bavaria's forces moved ANYWHERE NEAR THE TEUTONS as I pointed out, so he had to give up that falsehood and fall back on the "TOP SECRET" defense.
Originally posted by SuzianneSuzianne: Duh.
And this, from your supposed email to the GM, since none of us actually saw the actual email in question, just what you posted here:
"I have an inquiry regarding the above captioned game. A new player, billjarrell, entered the game last turn (turn 8) as Poland."
Aren't we on Turn 8 right now? Wasn't last turn Turn 7?
EDIT: Bah, it seems that I can't count... well, it's Friday, that must be it.
Originally posted by no1marauderBeeeeeeeeep - We're sorry, the number you have dialed is not in service. Check the number and please try again.
Who said they didn't, Princess DimWit? Only a sub-cretin would take my post to mean that they had no dealings before THE TURN; I was obviously anticipating that someone would suggest (as someone did) that the two parties knew each other from a previous GAME (or outside the game).
Just because you can't understand my point due to your extreme ...[text shortened]... inted out, so he had to give up that falsehood and fall back on the "TOP SECRET" defense.
Originally posted by KnightWulfeI actually only noticed this by accident - I was going to retreat all my troops from Rostov because there wasn't any help near and a large enemy army at hand. Suddenly I found out I could march to Arkangelski.
Did ya? LOL... thats funny... I did not have time to look that far northeast on the map....
Actually that's pretty stupid because there's a small lake between Rostov and Arkangelski as far as the map tells me. Oh well, Karelia is next 😛
Edit: Ladies, can you please take this arguing somewhere else. It's obvious that we'll have to wait for the G.M.'s decision, you lot can't play judge.
Originally posted by schakuhrBe conscripted into the Lithuanian army and see the world.
I actually only noticed this by accident - I was going to retreat all my troops from Rostov because there wasn't any help near and a large enemy army at hand. Suddenly I found out I could march to Arkangelski.
Actually that's pretty stupid because there's a small lake between Rostov and Arkangelski as far as the map tells me. Oh well, Karelia is next 😛 ...[text shortened]... . It's obvious that we'll have to wait for the G.M.'s decision, you lot can't play judge.
Originally posted by no1marauderMan! Are we even playing the same game? Are you really that stupid? Do you so lack in the most rudimentary concept of what this game is about?
Who said they didn't, Princess DimWit? Only a sub-cretin would take my post to mean that they had no dealings before THE TURN; I was obviously anticipating that someone would suggest (as someone did) that the two parties knew each other from a previous GAME (or outside the game).
Just because you can't understand my point due to your extreme inted out, so he had to give up that falsehood and fall back on the "TOP SECRET" defense.
WHY would Bavaria move forces near the Teutons? How does this make any possible point you could be trying to make? Even taking the same quote:
"Gee, would not have anything do do with a bargan struck with the new ruler to aid him with the Teutons in return..... Hmmm... "
What makes you think Bavaria's aid with the Teutons has to move towards the Teutons the SAME turn? Why would he divide his forces so? For someone who claims to be such a military mind, why would you think he would attack two enemies at once?
Read it again, Mr. Illiterate. He says "to aid him with the Teutons IN RETURN...", not at the same time, genius.
And all your posts seem to imply (yes, given crucial facts, you always imply, and when called on it, you say "I never said that" ) that Bavaria and Poland never had any communication of any kind.
Originally posted by schakuhrI'm merely pointing out to no1 that all of his foot-stomping and holding his breath isn't doing him any good... no one's buying it.
Edit: Ladies, can you please take this arguing somewhere else. It's obvious that we'll have to wait for the G.M.'s decision, you lot can't play judge.
Originally posted by SuziannePlease stop trying to act like you know anything about military matters; it's laughable. Even the Chosen One gave up that ridiculous assertion; I don't think the Teutons are going to be around long enough for Bavaria to assist anybody in their demise. KW was full of it and he knew it; only somebody of your breathtaking stupidity would fall for such an obvious untruth.
Man! Are we even playing the same game? Are you really that stupid? Do you so lack in the most rudimentary concept of what this game is about?
WHY would Bavaria move forces near the Teutons? How does this make any possible point you could be trying to make? Even taking the same quote:
"Gee, would not have anything do do with a bargan struck with ay "I never said that" ) that Bavaria and Poland never had any communication of any kind.
As for my posts, YOU CAN'T READ!! How in the name of God you would assume that I meant that they just randomly happened to move that way without any discussion is amazing. No reasonable person would assume that's what I meant. There's no way it can be construed so. You're a dunce, pure and simple (well, probably not toooooooo pure ......).
Originally posted by no1marauderBeeeeeeeeep - We're sorry, the number you have dialed is not in service. Check the number and please try again.
Please stop trying to act like you know anything about military matters; it's laughable. Even the Chosen One gave up that ridiculous assertion; I don't think the Teutons are going to be around long enough for Bavaria to assist anybody in their demise. KW was full of it and he knew it; only somebody of your breathtaking stupidity would fall for such an ob ...[text shortened]... at's what I meant. There's no way it can be construed so. You're a dunce, pure and simple.