1 edit
Originally posted by SuzianneSorry, but this kind of begs the question - there isn't any dispute that they planned the turn together. The question is, why?
Again, your continued meaningless tirade misses (or rather "evades" ) the point. You mean they've never heard of such a thing in another game *under the conditions as you posted them*. You completely failed to include the fact that Bavaria and Poland DID get together and plan their first turn together. Given this fact, you have no point about Bavaria let into the shape you want, and soon, NO one will believe anything you say... even Sicily...)
EDIT: I see now that no1 has made the same point, although his method was more 'colourful'.
Originally posted by orfeoIt's been brought to my attention that I've been a very mean person in this thread. I promise to never ever be mean to my wonderful fellow players again.
Sorry, but this kind of begs the question - there isn't any dispute that they planned the turn together. The question is, why?
EDIT: I see now that no1 has made the same point, although his method was more 'colourful'.
Now can I please have Istria, Dalmatia and Crete back?🙂
Originally posted by no1marauderDepending on the tone I mentally read that with, the effect is completely different.
It's been brought to my attention that I've been a very mean person in this thread. I promise to never ever be mean to my wonderful fellow players again.
Now can I please have Istria, Dalmatia and Crete back?🙂
Originally posted by no1marauderThe Dalmatian War Hounds tell me you were very mean to them too. They don't want to go back. PETA would lynch me if I tried to give Dalmatia back to you.
It's been brought to my attention that I've been a very mean person in this thread. I promise to never ever be mean to my wonderful fellow players again.
Now can I please have Istria, Dalmatia and Crete back?🙂
Suzianne - you post containing the e-mail thread between no1 and a GM has been removed as it contained the GMs e-mail address. I'm sure you meant no harm, but please don't post other peoples personal details without their express permission. If you want to repost please do so without the e-mail addresses.
Thanks for your understanding
BF
Originally posted by belgianfreakThe GM's e-mail address is public, isn't it?
Suzianne - you post containing the e-mail thread between no1 and a GM has been removed as it contained the GMs e-mail address. I'm sure you meant no harm, but please don't post other peoples personal details without their express permission. If you want to repost please do so without the e-mail addresses.
Thanks for your understanding
BF
1 edit
Originally posted by AThousandYoungIt is. BF may not of known how pulic it is... I personally would
The GM's e-mail address is public, isn't it?
not have removed it, since I know it already. Here is the reason
why he did remove it.
Even if an email is public, it should only be pasted here at RHP
if the owner says it is ok. For example, if you had a private
homepage that had your family name and email on it it would
not be right for an RHP user to go find that info and post it
here.
I don't want to be long winded about this, but BF had no way to
know it was public... and I'm not sure Russ wants any emails
posted in the forums regardless of how public they are.
Otherwise I'd put it back.
Suzzie should just post again with no email, or use site feedback??
I guess we could debate moderation, but I think this thread
is off topic well enough as it is.
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitI don't really care myself.
It is. BF may not of known how pulic it is... I personally would
not have removed it, since I know it already. Here is the reason
why he did remove it.
Even if an email is public, it should only be pasted here at RHP
if the owner says it is ok. For example, if you had a private
homepage that had your family name and email on it it would
no ...[text shortened]... we could debate moderation, but I think this thread
is off topic well enough as it is.
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitBut what I posted was NOT email... it was originally from a Yahoo user group and what I posted was excerpted from the digest version they send out. Everyone in these groups understands that it's a public forum.
It is. BF may not of known how pulic it is... I personally would
not have removed it, since I know it already. Here is the reason
why he did remove it.
Even if an email is public, it should only be pasted here at RHP
if the owner says it is ok. For example, if you had a private
homepage that had your family name and email on it it would
no ...[text shortened]... we could debate moderation, but I think this thread
is off topic well enough as it is.
P-
I understand your example about a private homepage, but there's nothing private about the user group's public messages.
But you're right that the mods here have no way to know that.
Originally posted by no1marauderYou just go on thinking I'm stupid. In fact, I *encourage* it.
Please stop trying to act like you know anything about military matters; it's laughable. Even the Chosen One gave up that ridiculous assertion; I don't think the Teutons are going to be around long enough for Bavaria to assist anybody in their demise. KW was full of it and he knew it; only somebody of your breathtaking stupidity would fall for such an ob ...[text shortened]... construed so. You're a dunce, pure and simple (well, probably not toooooooo pure ......).