Originally posted by Bosse de NageNo, you cannot lay siege. Not entering a fort means that if you are attacked, your troops will not automatically enter your fort but defend on land.
I want my troops to attack but not get themselves killed attacking a fort. Would ordering them not to enter garrisons achieve this? Effectively, I want to lay siege.
Evil
Evil is his one and only name
Evil
In his mind there is no other game
When your name is Evil that is good
Or so you think
But you're so very wrong
It's evil
But being wrong is right
So then you're good again
Which is the evilest thing of all
Do you find his subtle ways invite you
Does he excite you?
If his contradictions should attract you
Should he distract you
Heaven help you then
You're finished, it's the end
There'll be no retrieval
From the evil
The evil he will do
He's evil
He's Dr. Evil
His name is Evil
Originally posted by PhlabibitSo is Venice your Mini-Me?
Evil
Evil is his one and only name
Evil
In his mind there is no other game
When your name is Evil that is good
Or so you think
But you're so very wrong
It's evil
But being wrong is right
So then you're good again
Which is the evilest thing of all
Do you find his subtle ways invite you
Does he excite you?
If his contradictions should attr ...[text shortened]... rieval
From the evil
The evil he will do
He's evil
He's Dr. Evil
His name is Evil
1 edit
Originally posted by KnightWulfeYou are kidding, right??? You're army would be cowering in Munich if not for the double sneak attacks last turn. My attack wasn't a "sneak attack" as I explained to you before (if it was a surprise to you that shows your lack of knowledge of military strategy) and I would have done it even if Sicily hadn't joined in, but King Phil's boys couldn't resist the fun! I can't "defeat you alone" cuz you refuse to face me alone. Besides, you've been trying to get Sicily to join in this war since turn 2, you whining hypocrite! So now he's in; how's it feel??
Must say that it is an interesting development.
The only question I have is this:
I thought you were going to defeat me alone, no1? What happened? Hmmm... I thought so.
Phlab.... well played sneak attack - did not see it until your last PM to me. Speaking of - I thought that you were not going to be involved in sneak attack, no1? What happened t ...[text shortened]... s....
Anyway - I will be quiet here for a little bit - work has gotten rather busy this week.
So now it's 4 countries v. two although the way you manage your armies, it's more like 3 v. 2. Sicily's been benefiting from its alliance with Venice since day 1; it's been able to grow and expand without interference from any other realm. King Phil can see that if the Heathers prevail he's a certain target after Venice, something the Mad King of Arles is tooooooooooo stupid to realize.
BTW, perhaps you'd explain your strategy in leaving your siege machines vulnerable to attack and at a level 5 retreat. Guess they won't be knocking down Venice's walls after all!
Originally posted by no1marauderYou cant NOT personally attack me can you?
You are kidding, right??? You're army would be cowering in Munich if not for the double sneak attacks last turn. My attack wasn't a "sneak attack" as I explained to you before (if it was a surprise to you that shows your lack of knowledge of military strategy) and I would have done it even if Sicily hadn't joined in, but King Phil's boys couldn't resist ...[text shortened]... evel 5 retreat. Guess they won't be knocking down Venice's walls after all!
Yeesh...whatever dude. I am done with you here. Have fun ranting.