1 edit
Originally posted by Jean HebertYes, you should not do this post. Public accusations are counter-productive (and non allowed in the forums), and simply saying you know of cheats here is not very useful to anyone.
Probably no should do this post... Please, no ask for name. They wish to be silent.
If you have suspicions and any supporting evidence, just PM me or any other game moderator and we'll investigate your claim.
This site's policy on cheating is one of zero tolerance. In my book, silence is tolerance.
Originally posted by GatecrasherI think he was referring to a post discussing how many IMs/FMs were at the site.
Yes, you should not do this post. Public accusations are counter-productive (and non allowed in the forums), and simply saying you know of cheats here is not very useful to anyone.
If you have suspicions and any supporting evidence, just PM me or any other game moderator and we'll investigate your claim.
This site's policy on cheating is one of zero tolerance. In my book, silence [b]is tolerance.[/b]
Originally posted by GatecrasherNice reading comprehension there buddy.
Yes, you should not do this post. Public accusations are counter-productive (and non allowed in the forums), and simply saying you know of cheats here is not very useful to anyone.
If you have suspicions and any supporting evidence, just PM me or any other game moderator and we'll investigate your claim.
This site's policy on cheating is one of zero tolerance. In my book, silence [b]is tolerance.[/b]
Originally posted by GatecrasherI like pointing and laughing.
Yes, you should not do this post. Public accusations are counter-productive (and non allowed in the forums), and simply saying you know of cheats here is not very useful to anyone.
If you have suspicions and any supporting evidence, just PM me or any other game moderator and we'll investigate your claim.
This site's policy on cheating is one of zero tolerance. In my book, silence [b]is tolerance.[/b]
Thanks for the opportunity.
: D
😳😳😳😳😳
My apologies. Damn, I have a one track mind.
In my defence, the previous post proclaimed that BOOYA is gone! And then Jean says he knows of two others. He did not quote the post he was replying to.
His post makes perfect sense now. And I just thought he was struggling with his English...
Ah, well...
😳😳😳😳😳
7 edits
Originally posted by Freddie2006This is what worries me most about the Game Mods, and the reason why I suspect that their methods are based on subjective guess-work and circumstantial evidence, rather than anything more objectively scientific.
It's such a pity some other blatent users didn't go as well
Meman should have been long gone, certainly as clear to call as the first scalp, Ironman31. I think the Mods should have focused their actual analysis on the increasing number of 2200+ rated players before using dubious assumptions about my ability based on early games here and unreliable detection tools to leap to their conclusions.
I think you're right, Fred, to suspect that there are still more blatant statistics that point irrefutably to engine use, unless we assume that this site is graced by many anonymous Grand Masters.
Originally posted by GatecrasherSeriously,
It's got a certain ring to it. I think it would be a huge hit.
CHAPTER ONE
It was a dark and stormy night....
Can we have quicker decisions on banning people and/or can I/others help analysing games etc. to provide evidence faster to make those decisions ...
There are still far too many engines out there
Regards
Boris
Originally posted by Steve Exeter7 edits steve ??
This is what worries me most about the Game Mods, and the reason why I suspect that their methods are based on subjective guess-work and circumstantial evidence, rather than anything more objectively scientific.
Meman should have been long gone, certainly as clear to call as the first scalp, Ironman31. I think the Mods should have focused their actu ...[text shortened]... tably to engine use, unless we assume that this site is graced by many anonymous Grand Masters.
