Memo

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
Because a person does not speak up loudly and incessantly about something, does not automatically mean they are not appalled.

What does the fact that Suzianne speaks up loudly and incessantly about divegeester perhaps "not automatically mean" about her being appalled or not appalled?

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
That being said, he apologized.I accept people's apologies as I hope that people will accept mine. No one seemed to like or approve of his apology. Of course not. There could never be an apology issued by him that would have sufficed.

What exactly did he apologize for? Did he apologize for saying that disagreement with the supposed "truth" he was propagating amounted to peddling "premeditated lies"? If he apologized for that, I'd appreciate you pointing it out to me.

Originally posted by FMF
On the matter of Seitse's behaviour, didn't you yourself say something along the lines of every forum needs a poster like him?

Yes, I did. The GBs of the world, too.
But it seems no one hardly ever confronts Seitse's posts with the diligence and outrage that is directly towards GB.

Why do you suppose that is?

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
Yes, I did. The GBs of the world, too.
But it seems no one hardly ever confronts Seitse's posts with the diligence and outrage that is directly towards GB.

Why do you suppose that is?

Seitse is our man of the year.

-Removed-

Back of the net dive.

Originally posted by FMF
What does the fact that Suzianne speaks up loudly and incessantly about divegeester perhaps "not automatically mean" about her being appalled or not appalled?

I am not sure what you mean here.
I haven't followed along enough to know why they are so at odds.

Originally posted by FMF
What exactly did he apologize for? Did he apologize for saying that disagreement with the supposed "truth" he was propagating amounted to peddling "premeditated lies"? If he apologized for that, I'd appreciate you pointing it out to me.

So much interrogation....4 back to back questions in your consecutive posts here. So I am already losing interest in our "discussion." No offense 🙂

Have I ever said anything you have agreed with? Ever? Thread please? 😉

You can rewind the tape if you wish. I don't need to go backwards. He apologized.
If Seitse apologized just once for anything it would be accepted. Sincere, insincere - wouldn't matter. Seitse says whatever insensitive and/or offensive thing that he wishes and he is rarely called on it.

-Removed-

You were saying the other day how you were leaving this site.
When?

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
But it seems no one hardly ever confronts Seitse's posts with the diligence and outrage that is directly towards GB.

Why do you suppose that is?

Well I have confronted him several times over the years. The problem ~ I suppose ~ is that posters like you don't confront him.

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
He apologized.

I know, you said that before. But I am asking, what is it you believe he apologized for?

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
If Seitse apologized just once for anything it would be accepted. Sincere, insincere - wouldn't matter. Seitse says whatever insensitive and/or offensive thing that he wishes and he is rarely called on it.

Why don't you call him out on it?

Originally posted by FMF
Well I have confronted him several times over the years. The problem ~ I suppose ~ is that posters like you don't confront him.

Thread of you confronting Seitse, please?

Yes. I actually have. It is just that your idea of confronting him and mine are totally different.

I "confront" him at times by trying to use some humor. Mostly because his comments are so outrageous and so obviously attention-seeking, that I do not feel they warrant a serious "confrontation."

He accused me of saying something racist - I responded to that the way I saw was appropriate.

Originally posted by Landisqueen170
[b]Thread of you confronting Seitse, please?[b]

A recent one was on the "What is Civility?" thread.