- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
-Removed-Page 120, sixth post from the top, Landisqueen's post at 05.06 GMT today gives evidence of one instance of your hypocrisy.
The discerning reader will see many more throughout this thread and others.
But really, I shouldn't need to spoonfeed you; in fact your question was merely spurious, part of your contentious attitude.
In essence, you and FMF are nothing more than forum trolls, out to draw others into your webs and traps.
Originally posted by StartreaderYou said that GHOST HUNTER was "totally correct" to claim I was "obviously" a "women hater". Talking of "trolls" and "trolling", I*'m curious: do you stand by this claim?
In essence, you and FMF are nothing more than forum trolls, out to draw others into your webs and traps.
-Removed-It most certainly is evidence of your hypocrisy. You have attempted to find a moral pretext against others when someone suggested that you have amorous feelings towards someone else of the same sex and you yourself were guilty of doing the very same thing. Now i don't know how far reality has to go before it makes any inroads to those almost unreachable recesses of your mind, but attempting to moralize over other people for doing what you yourself have done makes you a hypocrite.
Originally posted by SuzianneYou describe the world, not just the internet.
A problem with the internet is that it is made up of people with differing standards, morals and tolerances. If your tolerance for the opinions of others is so low that you get physically sick, perhaps you need to find another hobby.
I watch your posts and I see you talking about being upset about fighting in here. We have never spoken on the Internet and yet your first post to me is to tell me to go always because I'm upset about something someone said. Why should I not feel sick to my stomach about those things Grampy Bobby said? Why do you defend them? Why?