Originally posted by Proper KnobOne thing you need to know about Startreader is that she probably sees a firstly-secondly-thirdly question like yours as an "attack" on her. 😛
Firstly could you point to where I have 'attacked' Roberts religion, secondly where I have 'attacked' him and thirdly where I have been hypocritical with respect to Roberts right to worship?
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by FMFHypocrite.
Who has suggested that there should be any restrictions on people's right to worship as they choose?
Rather than the focus being his religion, I instead think the salient points here have been [1] whether criticism or a lack of support constitutes an attack on the freedom of the person being criticized, and [2] whether criticism, a lack of support, or a lack of positive comments constitute bigotry. I'd say 'no' in answer to both points.
Remind your sidekick to add that to his pathetic list.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 326101
Originally posted by FMFDo you have any mode of speech other than permanent sneer?
This is just you dodging the content of my post. 😕
It's as if you have no interest whatsoever in any of the things that anyone discusses here. 😀
You're correct in thinking I have absolutely no interest in anything you have to say about anything because you are either in sneer, bully, or pretend prosecuting counsel mode.
This does not extent to Captain Strange. Just you and your Siamese twin.
Originally posted by StartreaderMore dodging wrapped up in yet more pointless letting off of your rancorous steam. 😉
Do you have any mode of speech other than permanent sneer?
You're correct in thinking I have absolutely no interest in anything you have to say about anything because you are either in sneer, bully, or pretend prosecuting counsel mode.
This does not extent to Captain Strange. Just you and your Siamese twin.
Originally posted by StartreaderI've said it before and will probably say it again, but FMF's style
Do you have any mode of speech other than permanent sneer?
You're correct in thinking I have absolutely no interest in anything you have to say about anything because you are either in sneer, bully, or pretend prosecuting counsel mode.
This does not extent to Captain Strange. Just you and your Siamese twin.
is very inquisitorial and I can imagine annoying, it is easy to see
how those of a lower intellect would perceive it as "sneering".
It would probably be better for FMF not to assume anything
about the audience of his posts.
Originally posted by wolfgang59Whether they admit or are conscious of it or not, everyone makes assumptions about the intellect and character of the people they interact with (here) based on the things they write and how they behave. I have no doubt I am 'evaluated' in the same way and I have no problem with it.
I've said it before and will probably say it again, but FMF's style
is very inquisitorial and I can imagine annoying, it is easy to see
how those of a lower intellect would perceive it as "sneering".
It would probably be better for FMF not to assume anything
about the audience of his posts.
