Go back
Memo

Memo

General


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
There is also the matter of corroboration. I knew one man who was not a witness whose step daughter falsely accused him of abuse over a family row about money.
Can't this be left to the law enforcement authorities and to specialists that they can call on?


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The downside of mandatory reporting is that perpetrators may be less likely to come forward if they know that as soon as they do it will be reported. There is also the matter of corroboration. I knew one man who was not a witness whose step daughter falsely accused him of abuse over a family row about money.
How many perpetrators of sexual abuse have come forward of their own free will?



Originally posted by Proper Knob
How many perpetrators of sexual abuse have come forward of their own free will?
robbie blanked this question out when I asked it on last year's thread - and well he might seeing as not knowing the answer ~ which he doesn't ~ pulls the carpet from under the notion that letting sex abuse remain unreported results in less sex abuse.


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The downside of mandatory reporting is that perpetrators may be less likely to come forward if they know that as soon as they do it will be reported.
Does your organization [1] foster an atmosphere in which pedophiles can come forward or "repent" safe in the knowledge that their crimes won't be reported, or does your organization [2] foster an atmosphere in which children who are victims of sex crimes can come forward safe in the knowledge that the adults around them will report their abusers to the authorities? It can't really be both. So which is it?


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Thankyou for demonstrating what an irrational, ill-informed, ignorant and habitually critical bigot you evidently purport to be.[/b]
So no flowers for me on Sunday?


-Removed-
The poor chumps are under the cosh to bring in a new convert every month.


Originally posted by GHOST HUNTER
i agreed there was a cover up, many other organisations did they same, catholic church scouts etc.
The excuse ' everyone is at it ' is not acceptable.


-Removed-
You are being very generous calling it a religious organisation dive.
I could wear a funny hat and speak French.
Doesn't make me Napoleon.


Originally posted by FMF
In the UK and the US, I'd no doubt be bullied for who I am ~ just as I am here at RHP. By contrast, in France, they put their intellectuals on prime time TV.
Your right FMF.
Some people cant deal with straight talkers.(you know who you are and
its not just spooky)

1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You do realise that there are laws to protect people from those who hide what they are in order to dupe and gain the trust of others.[/b]
LOL 🙄


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
ok could you be more specific?
Your evasive answers lead me to surmise that the Wikipedia article is completely factual and that you are too sheepish to admit it in front of your friends here on the General Forum. Do the JW elders approve of dishonesty?


Originally posted by HandyAndy
Your evasive answers lead me to surmise that the Wikipedia article is completely factual and that you are too sheepish to admit it in front of your friends here on the General Forum. Do the JW elders approve of dishonesty?
He will be flapping like an old budgie now 😀


63.1


Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
63.1
A Day of Judgement:

"Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments from Bozrah? this that is glorious in his apparel, travelling in the greatness of his strength? I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save."

Is that the fella?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.