Go back
Memo

Memo

General

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
This is just a propaganda piece, I gave genuine reasons why reporting was left up to the families of those involved, you formed it into a weapon to berate, vilify and slander me and now you get a taste of your own medicine you don't like it. Perhaps you should be more careful in future who you divulge information to and perhaps you should be more honest with who you really are on the internet.
I have never accused you of defending child abuse. Can't state it plainer than that. To say that I did is simply not true.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
549 people confessed to sexually abusing/raping children, their confessions were hushed up and they weren't reported to the police. Is this part of the 'awesomeness' of JW's you frequently mention?
549 have allegedly confessed, how many convictions have ensued, thankyou.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
549 have allegedly confessed, how many convictions have ensued, thankyou.
Do you think the 549 shouldn't have confessed?


Originally posted by robbie carrobie
549 have allegedly confessed, how many convictions have ensued, thankyou.
None. They weren't reported to the police. Duh!!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
I don't believe for one moment that incidents that were not reported at the time cannot go to court. Trials can take place retrospectively based on evidence. You will tell us now how many convictions have ensued from allegedly 1000's of allegations.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Proper Knob
None. They weren't reported to the police. Duh!!!
So lets get this, you have alleged that 500 confessions were made and the police cannot do a single thing? How is it that cases in the UK where abuse has taken place sometimes more than 20 years previously have reached court?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I don't believe for one moment that incidents that were not reported at the time cannot go to court. Trials can take place retrospectively based on evidence. You will tell us now how many convictions have ensued from allegedly 1000's of allegations.
Read the article. Insisting that you haven't and won't does not make you a very convincing participant in this debate.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Read the article. Insisting that you haven't and won't does not make you a very convincing participant in this debate.
No you will tell us out of literally thousands of allegations how many convictions have ensued. third time asking.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
You have and lets reiterate it, NO IDEA, and yet you seem to have a fairly good idea about how many allegations have been made. Why have you NO IDEA divesgeester?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You have and lets reiterate it, NO IDEA, and yet you seem to have a fairly good idea about how many allegations have been made. Why have you NO IDEA divesgeester?
Just read the article about the Australian Commission.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
I want you to tell the forum out of the 1000's of allegations that have been made why they have not reached a court of law if there was criminality involved.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.