Originally posted by robbie carrobieIn what sense? Well, how about decades of not reporting at least 1,000 cases of alleged sex abuse ~ affecting at least 1,800 children, stretching back to the middle of the C20th ~ to the authorities in Australia, and only doing so when forced to by a Royal Commission 15 years into the C21st. "Cover ups" in that sense.
if Jehovahs witnesses provided all the details to those who asked for it as was stated by Proper Knob in what sense are you stating that there was a cover up?
Originally posted by GHOST HUNTERHe is like a total clone,
been there answered that, i do answer questions unlike you. you seem rattled that FMF has been exposed as a liar and pervert, there is no other way to describe pretending to be a girl, in a site that contains children.
your thoughts?
no don't bother, i don't care what you think.
you seem rattled? an FMF style trolling statement,
have you changed your position, another FMF style trolling question presenting a false dimenna
Its like a carbon copy
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFYes in what sense are you saying there was a cover up? I could see the fact if they refused to provide any details and shredded all documents and torched all hard drives but they simply handed everything over? in what sense were they forced? did the Royal commission get a court order which forced them to give up information? even if it did it does not necessitate that there was a cover up, so yes in what sense was there as you have alleged a cover up.
In what sense? Well, how about decades of not reporting at least 1,000 cases of alleged sex abuse ~ affecting at least 1,800 children, stretching back to the middle of the C20th ~ to the authorities in Australia, and only doing so when forced to by a Royal Commission 15 years into the C21st. "Cover ups" in that sense.
Originally posted by robbie carrobiehe must be heart broken, his hero being exposed as a filthy pervert
He is like a total clone,
you seem rattled? an FMF style trolling statement,
have you changed your position, another FMF style trolling question presenting a false dimenna
Its like a carbon copy
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAllegations about serious criminal actions made by at least 1,800 children were all kept secret from the authorities. So I mean "cover ups" in that sense.
Yes in what sense are you saying there was a cover up? I could see the fact if they refused to provide any details and shredded all documents and torched all hard drives but they simply handed everything over? in what sense were they forced? did the Royal commission get a court order which forced them to give up information? even if it did it does no ...[text shortened]... sitate that there was a cover up, so yes in what sense was there as you have alleged a cover up.