Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveRHC? At least I bloody know what I'm talkin' about.
Haha, the Steven Hawking of RHC has spoken.
You actually make yourself sound stupid by writing stupid things. I haven't said you ARE stupid, just that some of the crap you spout parrot fashion is stupid.
Anyways, anything I write which you percieve to be anything but entertainment, has a deep rooted political sentiment behind it.
Obviously it is for you to judge what I write and it is equally fair to say that if you think it's stupid, then so be it.
However, to suggest I write parrot-like (with which I presume you mean repetative) is quite insulting.
Don't worry though, I'll be sure to return the favour at the first possible oppertunity.
Originally posted by shavixmirrhc = redhotchess
RHC? At least I bloody know what I'm talkin' about.
Anyways, anything I write which you percieve to be anything but entertainment, has a deep rooted political sentiment behind it.
Obviously it is for you to judge what I write and it is equally fair to say that if you think it's stupid, then so be it.
However, to suggest I write parrot-like ( ...[text shortened]... ng.
Don't worry though, I'll be sure to return the favour at the first possible oppertunity.
Speaking of cheats,I was playing a game against a 1400-1500 dude and he's not moving since three days.
The game was 1 day t/O without timebank,but a little writing appeared ,near the game name,which says "please wait" and apparently prevents me from claiming the timeout.
Today I discovered that the player is banned (even if he doesn't appear yet amongst the removed players) and that I probably will have to wait until his rating will be set to 500 to claim the victory.
This is damn unfair.
Originally posted by darvlayYou must have unusual relationships with your siblings... Are condoms provided at family reunions?
How can you guys fight like this on such a beautiful Monday morning (or afternoon)? I urge you all to turn to your neighbour and french-kiss them passionately in the spirit of brother and sisterhood.
Originally posted by shavixmirSnore......
Well, no. I don't make these numbers up.
The Body count death toll is 26.000 (which is still asocial, in my books), other counts range from between 30 to 100 thousand deaths.
The number of dead children from 1990 to 2000 is +500.000 due to cancer. This number is the amount above the amount of child deaths related to cancer in the previous decade. Re ...[text shortened]... imple.
EDIT: Just for you: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7967-2004Oct28.html
Why don't you go out and change the world rather than worrying about what a
private person does on his private site.
Send your $30 bucks to feed starving children or fight cancer or something.
Your bellyaching about a list of people who cheated in explicit violation with a
principal rule of this site is totally out of proportion with the other nonsense you
are spouting.
It's pathetic.
Nemesio