01 Jun 07
Originally posted by z00tz00t + Forum Access = Psychotic obsessed with ratings who bores the hole out of everyone else.
We are short of excitement in the General Forum and so we should probably revisit this one. Can anyone write a mathematical formula to differentiate between padding and non-padding.
G=P*NP(R-Q)
01 Jun 07
Originally posted by st00p1dfac3Your file was handed over to us at the Bureau of Padding Investigations and it was recommended you spend a bit more time in the Chess Forum.
z00t + Forum Access = Psychotic obsessed with ratings who bores the hole out of everyone else.
01 Jun 07
2 edits
Originally posted by z00tBut you're in the chess forum - it sort of ruins the place. I don't get seen in places that let that sort of person in...
Your file was handed over to us at the [b]Bureau of Padding Investigations and it was recommended you spend a bit more time in the Chess Forum.[/b]
PS - This is the first time I get to say this, but - Get a goddamn subscription if your rating on this site means so much to you, you cheap sack.
01 Jun 07
Originally posted by st00p1dfac3If I was obsessed with ratings I would be targeting weaker players for rating points. I play at PlayChess.com daily and here is to brush off my openings. If the facilities for speedchess here were like playchess.com I would be the first subscriber.
But you're in the chess forum - it sort of ruins the place. I don't get seen in places that let that sort of person in...
PS - This is the first time I get to say this, but - Get a goddamn subscription if your rating on this site means so much to you, you cheap sack.
01 Jun 07
Originally posted by z00tSo, you're spamming? This means nothing, so what you are posting means nothing, so it's spam? I believe that violates the TOS.
If I was obsessed with ratings I would be targeting weaker players for rating points. I play at PlayChess.com daily and here is to brush off my openings. If the facilities for speedchess here were like playchess.com I would be the first subscriber.
01 Jun 07
Originally posted by z00tWell, you post a concern about ratings here - whether they're "padded" or not, then proceed to say that here doesn't matter. Concern denotes feeling, feeling denotes meaning. But if all of that part is missing, you're stirring it for the sake of stirring it - therefore spamming.
HeHe Hehe have you been sniffing glue or what?
02 Jun 07
Originally posted by z00tspeedchess is for losers who can't win a game themselves and have to rely on a clock to win for them. it's exactly like these 0/1 idiots who have to win by timeout or they'd never win anything.
All your Sicilian Smaug are belong to us. I would like to kick you and Marinatomb's butt at playchess.com tomorrow at 3:00 p.m at 3/5mins per game.
02 Jun 07
Originally posted by SuzianneThey invented clocks because idiots take all the time in the world. Look at this game that is still going on Thread 65547 That is lunacy. They should play a couple of games in an afternoon and everyone can watch.
speedchess is for losers who can't win a game themselves and have to rely on a clock to win for them. it's exactly like these 0/1 idiots who have to win by timeout or they'd never win anything.
You seem to be from the time abusers club of people who cannot make moves within the stipulated period. Even 1 day timeout is more than the 20 moves in an hour in official chess competition. If the world chess championship is held like the Rahimk-Cmsmaster game that would not be a championship it would be a circus.
02 Jun 07
Originally posted by z00tHave you ever heard about Correspondence Chess?
They invented clocks because idiots take all the time in the world. Look at this game that is still going on Thread 65547 That is lunacy. They should play a couple of games in an afternoon and everyone can watch.
You seem to be from the [b]time abusers club of people who cannot make moves within the stipulated period. Even 1 day timeout is ...[text shortened]... ip is held like the Rahimk-Cmsmaster game that would not be a championship it would be a circus.[/b]