Originally posted by lemon limeYikes, maybe there's something in her 'environment' that gives advantage to the 'Y guys'...
To be fair, I think Freaky and I have done our part to tip the ballance of power to a more estrogen enriched environment, I with fathering 3 girls (and only two boys) and Freakys 4 to 2 ratio... not to the online world of fantasy but in real life. I like my sister and don't want to say anything critical of her, but as enlightened humans beings I feel it's ...[text shortened]... o acknowledge the truth no matter how painful that truth might be... she's the mother of 5 boys.
Originally posted by Tabitha MarshallI think he (her husband) had something to do with that. Maybe it's not his fault though, maybe he just doesn't have any girls in him to give to her. She doesn't complain though, in her opinion boys are much easier to raise than girls.
It is not her who decides, is it?
Originally posted by FMFGive us the thread link and measure your invective.
You said this on page 5 of this thread:
[b]Unlike some, I type out the words imagining the person to whom I am responding (if it is that specific) as though they are within my physical periphery, and I theirs.
I couldn't live with myself knowing I've represented something about myself other than what I know to be faithful and accurate.
In other words, ...[text shortened]... nline a year or two ago ~ expressing your suspicions that I might have sex with my own children?
My bet is that you have yet another swing-and-a-miss.
Sorry: I should have known better than to offer a sports phrase.
Originally posted by lemon limeAs a general rule, the boys have been very easy to raise: about as smart as sheep and very easy to steer one way or another.
I think he (her husband) had something to do with that. Maybe it's not his fault though, maybe he just doesn't have any girls in him to give to her. She doesn't complain though, in her opinion boys are much easier to raise than girls.
The girls have been so much smarter in nearly every way (exception: academics, where they've been about dead even with the boys), and very versed in social interactions.
But in all, a complete joy.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHSame here. The boys reminded me of when I was a boy, and the girls gave me some insight into women when they talked among themselves about boys.
As a general rule, the boys have been very easy to raise: about as smart as sheep and very easy to steer one way or another.
The girls have been so much smarter in nearly every way (exception: academics, where they've been about dead even with the boys), and very versed in social interactions.
But in all, a complete joy.
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFPardon my interruption.
You said this on page 5 of this thread:
[b]Unlike some, I type out the words imagining the person to whom I am responding (if it is that specific) as though they are within my physical periphery, and I theirs.
I couldn't live with myself knowing I've represented something about myself other than what I know to be faithful and accurate.
In other words, ...[text shortened]... nline a year or two ago ~ expressing your suspicions that I might have sex with my own children?
Living in the past is passé.
Things happen, not always to our advantage or liking. We have to pick up the pieces and move on. Opening up old wounds is working against Mother Nature.
Edit: Oooops, wrong forum, I meant to reply in Chess Only.
Never mind, forget the post.
1 edit
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyOnline vs. Offline: Part Two
Online vs. Offline
Do people portray themselves in online forums in the same way they really are in their social lives, workplace and at home?
Do internet users typically spend more of their discretionary leisure time online [information searches, Facebook, dating sites, online correspondence chess, forums ] or offline [at home, with friends and attending community functions]?
Originally posted by SuzianneAs usual you are only coming through in waves of slobbery drool, its not high tide yet but if i continue to humour you, could we expect a drool tsunami
You can't thumb yourself, duh...
Well, I dunno... maybe YOU can...
but then that's nothing to do with this thread, is it?
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyNow that the weather is tolerable, I'll be spending less time online and more time interacting with my real life environment in real time.
[b]Online vs. Offline: Part Two
Do internet users typically spend more of their discretionary leisure time online [information searches, Facebook, dating sites, online correspondence chess, forums ] or offline [at home, with friends and attending community functions]?[/b]