Well...
What can one say.
I love you.
But, besides this immense point of cosmic importance, I feel I should tell you's all (although I seriously doubt anyone cares, nor should they, I couldn't give a damn if you wrote it either...) that I saw Pirates of the Carr..Caribb...well...whatever... part III and I really liked it.
What amazed me most is that Barbossa actually steals the show from Sparrow. Sparrow seemed a little strained, over-done, repetitive, but Barbossa was rockin' all the way to the bottle of rum.
Ho ho ho.
Am I drunk? Who can say?
Originally posted by belgianfreakII was okay. It was obviously a "centre" piece.
what did you make of II? I thought it was bloody awful, so if you liked II then I'll still give III a miss 🙂
The thing is...the Sparrow character only shines when his light is reflected off shiny objects. There was no Barbossa in II.
And now in III, you see that his shining is actually a reflection. That of Barbassa's. I don't know who (I could look it up on IMDB.com, but I can't be arsed) plays the Irish accented pirate, but it's very, very good.
Keith Richards is a token role.