Originally posted by ChessPraxisAnd that's the issue isn't it. I may not like what you have to say all the time, but, I'm rarely left with any doubt as to where you stand on an issue. If we are vague or dismissive in how we communicate on the internet, we risk misunderstandings and conflict.
But it's usually something else. 😛
Originally posted by Very RustySo how does Grampy Bobby's sneering comment relate to the topic of this thread or to the poster he was clearly referring to? Why has he suddenly brought up "some people's children"?
Only if they were sassy little buggers, & couldn't let something rest.
I'd then have to give the parents a piece of my mind also! 😛
Originally posted by FMFDon't you think you should be asking him?
So how does Grampy Bobby's sneering comment relate to the topic of this thread or to the poster he was clearly referring to? Why has he suddenly brought up "some people's children"?
BTW: Do you think everything GB rights is about you?
Some would call that paranoid.
I think you just like to keep the ball rolling, especially since you know you were wrong in talking in a public forum about something private.
Originally posted by FMF"Would you persist in talking to someone else's children even if their parents had asked you politely not to?"
Would you persist in talking to someone else's children even if their parents had asked you politely not to?
Only if someone else's children were their own parents as well as their own grandpaws.
-
2 edits
Originally posted by KewpieClose but no cigarette. Common phrase denotes childish behaviour in contrast to other
Wonder why you feel the need to obfuscate? "Some people's children" is a sneer intended to represent the other poster, if I read you right.
tasteless contemporary slang which demeans or denigrates the very person of the poster.
-
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyWhat makes you think Agerg's objection to receiving unwanted PMs from you can be characterized as "childish behaviour"?
Close but no cigarette. Common phrase denotes childish behaviour in contrast to other
tasteless contemporary slang which demean or denigrate the very person of the poster.
-
1 edit
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyThe ChessPraxis post you responded to was about Agerg. I am not a regular here on the GF. Do you make snide remarks about "some people's children", when they say something you don't agree with, on a regular basis?
Replied to ChessPraxis, not to you or Ag.
Originally posted by Hand of HecatePrecisely. Anything more is suspect; anything less is tantamount to dancing
And that's the issue isn't it. I may not like what you have to say all the time, but, I'm rarely left with any doubt as to where you stand on an issue. If we are vague or dismissive in how we communicate on the internet, we risk misunderstandings and conflict.
around in circles clad in a turtlneck and two overcoats on the forum floor.
-