Go back
PMs from Grampy Bobby

PMs from Grampy Bobby

General


Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Wonder why some people's children become so easily threatened.
Wonder why you feel the need to obfuscate? "Some people's children" is a sneer intended to represent the other poster, if I read you right.


Originally posted by ChessPraxis
But it's usually something else. 😛
And that's the issue isn't it. I may not like what you have to say all the time, but, I'm rarely left with any doubt as to where you stand on an issue. If we are vague or dismissive in how we communicate on the internet, we risk misunderstandings and conflict.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Would you persist in talking to someone else's children even if their parents had asked you politely not to?
Only if they were sassy little buggers, & couldn't let something rest.

I'd then have to give the parents a piece of my mind also! 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Only if they were sassy little buggers, & couldn't let something rest.

I'd then have to give the parents a piece of my mind also! 😛
So how does Grampy Bobby's sneering comment relate to the topic of this thread or to the poster he was clearly referring to? Why has he suddenly brought up "some people's children"?


Originally posted by FMF
So how does Grampy Bobby's sneering comment relate to the topic of this thread or to the poster he was clearly referring to? Why has he suddenly brought up "some people's children"?
Don't you think you should be asking him?

BTW: Do you think everything GB rights is about you?

Some would call that paranoid.

I think you just like to keep the ball rolling, especially since you know you were wrong in talking in a public forum about something private.


Originally posted by FMF

Would you persist in talking to someone else's children even if their parents had asked you politely not to?
"Would you persist in talking to someone else's children even if their parents had asked you politely not to?"

Only if someone else's children were their own parents as well as their own grandpaws.
-

Vote Up
Vote Down

There's private, and then there's private. Preaching and proselytising is never private.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
[b]"Would you persist in talking to someone else's children even if their parents had asked you politely not to?"

Only if someone else's children were their own parents as well as their own grandpaws.
-[/b]
😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Do you think everything GB rights is about you?
I think what he wrote about "some people's children" was a reference to Agerg not me.

2 edits

Originally posted by Kewpie

Wonder why you feel the need to obfuscate? "Some people's children" is a sneer intended to represent the other poster, if I read you right.
Close but no cigarette. Common phrase denotes childish behaviour in contrast to other

tasteless contemporary slang which demeans or denigrates the very person of the poster.
-

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Close but no cigarette. Common phrase denotes childish behaviour in contrast to other

tasteless contemporary slang which demean or denigrate the very person of the poster.
-
What makes you think Agerg's objection to receiving unwanted PMs from you can be characterized as "childish behaviour"?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
I think what he wrote about "some people's children" was a reference to Agerg not me.
Or a statement made in general.

I was him I'd throw you into the bunch! 😛


Originally posted by FMF

I think what he wrote about "some people's children" was a reference to Agerg not me.
Replied to ChessPraxis, not to you or Ag.

1 edit

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Replied to ChessPraxis, not to you or Ag.
The ChessPraxis post you responded to was about Agerg. I am not a regular here on the GF. Do you make snide remarks about "some people's children", when they say something you don't agree with, on a regular basis?


Originally posted by Hand of Hecate

And that's the issue isn't it. I may not like what you have to say all the time, but, I'm rarely left with any doubt as to where you stand on an issue. If we are vague or dismissive in how we communicate on the internet, we risk misunderstandings and conflict.
Precisely. Anything more is suspect; anything less is tantamount to dancing

around in circles clad in a turtlneck and two overcoats on the forum floor.
-