RHP's Official Lost Subscription Counter™

Originally posted by Very Rusty
You don't quite understand. They would look at what you and suz had to say previously before she sent you the P.M.!!! You may have been just as at fault or maybe even more so. Perhaps that is why you didn't send it to them.

Well Suzianne's PM was sent at 19:07 Western Indonesia Time (just after 12 noon GMT) on October 06th 2016, so you can look into it if your curiosity is sincere.

Originally posted by Very Rusty
You have to admit you haven't been exactly gentleman like towards her at all.

I don't know how Suzianne's gender or my gender has anything to do with it. Do you think that abusers have a right to keep their abusive behaviour secret and that the people they abuse have some obligation to cooperate in keeping the abuse secret? If so, what is the gender angle that you see?

Originally posted by FMF
Well Suzianne's PM was sent at 19:07 Western Indonesia Time (just after 12 noon GMT) on October 06th 2016, so you can look into it if your curiosity is sincere.

FMF,

You are completely missing my point as you have no answer for me. I am saying you could be just as much at fault for things you said to her in the forums? Only you would know that. I've seen times where you were less than gentleman like towards her as I've said.

-VR

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Exactly he is not the kind of person that one trusts with a confidential text as is now rather evident.

What "confidential text"?

Originally posted by Very Rusty
You are completely missing my point as you have no answer for me. I am saying you could be just as much at fault for things you said to her in the forums?

Everything posted in the forums is there for everyone to see. I completely stand by everything I've ever said to everybody. If you have detected "faults" in the way I have dealt with Suzianne's behaviour in public, then you are free to criticize them.

Originally posted by FMF
I don't know how Suzianne's gender or my gender has anything to do with it. Do you think that abusers have a right to keep their abusive behaviour secret and that the people they abuse have some obligation to cooperate in keeping the abuse secret? If so, what is the gender angle that you see?

FMF,

Again if you think it is abusive you report it to the Administration. They can look at the history between you and the party involved and decide if it was or not. As it concerns you that makes you bias, and a 3rd party would have to decide after looking over exchanges between you and the one your making the accusations about.

-VR

Originally posted by Very Rusty
I am saying you could be just as much at fault for things you said to her in the forums? Only you would know that.

Only I could "know"? What nonsense. Anybody can "know" whatever they want to "know" about what is said in public on the forums.

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Again if you think it is abusive you report it to the Administration.

I have already explained why I dealt with it in the way I chose to. Take a look. It has been explained on this thread. And it was explained on the thread about this on the Site Ideas forum.

Originally posted by FMF
Only I could "know"? What nonsense. Anybody can "know" whatever they want to "know" about what is said in public on the forums.

FMF,

Don't play that game with me. You know exactly what you said to her in the forums. You know what may have set her off to send you the P.M. she did. I certainly don't follow your every post. I know they would find you have not always been a gentleman towards her.

-VR

Originally posted by Very Rusty
Don't play that game with me. You know exactly what you said to her in the forums. You know what may have set her off to send you the P.M. she did. I certainly don't follow your every post.

If you think there was a problem with what I said to her in public, then that is a matter for you. I am unaware of any problem - and I certainly did not direct any abuse or threats at her.

Originally posted by Very Rusty
I know they would find you have not always been a gentleman towards her.

I don't understand this gender angle you keep mentioning.

Originally posted by FMF
What "confidential text"?

The private mail that she sent to you. The one that gets you banned when you post it on the public forum, that one. The one that you shared with all your minions in order to humiliate the sender. The one that proves you cannot be trusted with a private text.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The private mail that she sent to you. The one that gets you banned when you post it on the public forum, that one.

There was no obligation of "confidentiality" for the PM in question. And no one has published it on the public forum. I think Suzianne should. If it's found not to consist of abuse and threats, I would look extremely dishonest.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The one that you shared with all your minions in order to humiliate the sender. The one that proves you cannot be trusted with a private text.

If you don't want to send me any messages because you don't trust me, then don't send me any messages, robbie.

Originally posted by FMF
If you think there was a problem with what I said to her in public, then that is a matter for you. I am unaware of any problem - and I certainly did not direct any abuse or threats at her.

FMF,

Would you say you've been a perfect Gentleman towards her in all you exchanges?

-VR