RHP's Official Lost Subscription Counter™

Originally posted by FMF
Well no one is compelling you to post on this thread, so what? Just address the reasons I gave you for the course of action I took instead of trying to work up a new catchphrase with the word "compel" in it.

Your claim was that the content compelled you to act in the way that you did, its a ludicrous argument. You were compelled by something more sinister were you not? you wanted to humiliate the sender, to expose her text so that others could gaze upon it in mocking wonderment. You like belittling people in this way don't you? It makes you feel alive doesn't it?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
You have also endorsed appealing to a third party and cannot tell us why you did not.

I have told you EXACTLY why I did not alert Suzianne's message or try to get her banned. I have told you exactly why. And repeatedly. You have ignored it over and over again.

Originally posted by FMF
I have told you EXACTLY why I did not alert Suzianne's message or try to get her banned. I have told you exactly why. And repeatedly. You have ignored it over and over again.

It just does not make much sense. If you were concerned about the alleged abuse you would have appealed to the site administration. I have not ignored it, I simply do not buy it.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Your claim was that the content compelled you to act in the way that you did

Where did I make this claim? I think you are lying, robbie. It's you who keeps saying "compel" " compelled" "compel" " compelled" "compel" " compelled" , and not me. Where are you saying I claimed I was "compelled" to take the action I took?

Originally posted by FMF
Where did I make this claim? I think you are lying, robbie. It's you who keeps saying "compel" " compelled" "compel" " compelled" "compel" " compelled" , and not me. Where are you saying I claimed I was "compelled" to take the action I took?

So you are now telling us that because it contained abuse it did not compel you to reveal its contents, oh dear you are not making much sense.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
It just does not make much sense. If you were concerned about the alleged abuse you would have appealed to the site administration. I have not ignored it, I simply do not buy it.

I have told you why I didn't appeal to the site administration. Explicitly. But you haven't addressed it at all. You keep saying I haven't explained my reasons. But I have.

Originally posted by FMF
Where did I make this claim? I think you are lying, robbie. It's you who keeps saying "compel" " compelled" "compel" " compelled" "compel" " compelled" , and not me. Where are you saying I claimed I was "compelled" to take the action I took?

this is your claim, that you revealed the contents because it contained abuse.

Originally posted by FMF
I have told you why I didn't appealed to the site administration. You haven't addressed it at all. You keep saying I haven't explained my reasons. But I have.

yes but nothing much you say is making any sense, first of all you tell us you revealed the contents because it contained abuse and now you are saying that is not the case.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
this is your claim, that you revealed the contents because it contained abuse.

You have just said this: "Your claim was that the content compelled you to act in the way that you did...".

Copy paste the post of mine where I made this claim that I was "compelled" to take the action I took.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
first of all you tell us you revealed the contents because it contained abuse and now you are saying that is not the case.

What on earth are you on about? Where have I said that the message did not contain abuse?

Originally posted by FMF
You have just said this: "[b]Your claim was that the content compelled you to act in the way that you did...".

Copy paste the post of mine where I made this claim that I was "compelled" to take the action I took.[/b]

you were not compelled by the abuse to reveal its content?

Originally posted by FMF
What on earth are you on about? Where have I said that the message did not contain abuse?

You have said that it contained abuse and this was the reason that you revealed the contents, is this or is this not the case?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you were not compelled by the abuse to reveal its content?

You've stated that this is what I have claimed. Please copy paste the post of mine where I made this claim that I was "compelled" to take the action I took. Paste it into your answer to this post. Settle this now.

Originally posted by FMF
You have just said this: "[b]Your claim was that the content compelled you to act in the way that you did...".

Copy paste the post of mine where I made this claim that I was "compelled" to take the action I took.[/b]

Perhaps I have misunderstood you, from what I can tell your position is that the text contained abuse and this is the reason that you revealed the contents, is this or is this not your position.

Originally posted by FMF
You've stated that this is what I have claimed. Please copy paste the post of mine where I made this claim that I was "compelled" to take the action I took. Paste it into your answer to this post. Settle this now.

simply answer the question and it will be revealed, perhaps i have misunderstood you. Now you can simply clarify the position.