Originally posted by robbie carrobieYes because the content of the message, in my view, abrogated any 'right' Suzianne might have felt she had to confidentiality. I wasn't "compelled" to do anything. But I didn't want Suzianne to cop a ban so I didn't report her to the web site.
You have said that it contained abuse and this was the reason that you revealed the contents, is this or is this not the case?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt will clarify your claim about what I have supposedly said if you simply copy paste the post of mine where I made this claim that I was "compelled" to take the action I took and led you to write this: "Your claim was that the content compelled you to act in the way that you did...". Copy paste it here so we can see what you're on about.
simply answer the question and it will be revealed, perhaps i have misunderstood you. Now you can simply clarify the position.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIf the message had been civil or even angry or even critical, I would have respected its confidentiality. I decided to show it to various forum regulars because it contained specific threats and the abuse was quite extraordinarily demented and deluded. I opted to do this instead of getting Suzianne into trouble with the web site for the reasons I have given.
Perhaps I have misunderstood you, from what I can tell your position is that the text contained abuse and this is the reason that you revealed the contents, is this or is this not your position.
Originally posted by FMFSure here it is,
It will clarify your claim about what I have supposedly said if you simply copy paste the post of mine where I made this claim that I was "compelled" to take the action I took and led you to write this: [b]"Your claim was that the content compelled you to act in the way that you did...". Copy paste it here so we can see what you're on about.[/b]
I've already told Suzianne, in public, that any abusive and threatening PMs from her will be forwarded to other posters here so they can read them -FMF
You have publicly admitted that any abusive texts will be sent to you will be made public. these are your words are they not. good.
Also you have repeatedly intimated that the reason that you made these texts public is that they contained abuse. This is your position.
Its now a rather easy affair to assert that the reason that you made these texts public is because you felt compelled to do so because they contained abuse. Is this or is this not the case.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie"Compelled". "Compel". "Compelled". "Compel". "Compelled". "Compel". "Compelled". "Compel". This clumsy red herring of yours is going nowhere, robbie. Just address the reasons I gave for my course of action.
Sure here it is,
I've already told Suzianne, in public, that any abusive and threatening PMs from her will be forwarded to other posters here so they can read them -FMF
You have publicly admitted that any abusive texts will be sent to you will be made public. these are your words are they not. good.
Also you have repeatedly intimated that ...[text shortened]... ause you felt compelled to do so because they contained abuse. Is this or is this not the case.
Originally posted by FMFOn the contrary i was simply trawling through your posts. Now given the above will you now confirm or deny that the reason that you made these texts public was that you felt compelled to do so because they contained abuse. Is this not the case. If you refuse to do so we shall continue on the basis that this was indeed your motive and that the idea that these texts compelled you to act in a specific way is nonsense, you having options open to you.
robbie has backed himself into a cul de sac of his own making.
2 edits
Originally posted by FMFThere is nothing clumsy about it, its clear from your texts that you feel compelled to share the private mail because they contained abuse. A nonsense argument because the texts did not compel you to act in anyway and we are not left wondering what the real reason for your heinous act of betrayal was. I would say that rather than being clumsy you seem to have been taken apart piece by piece.
"Compelled". "Compel". "Compelled". "Compel". "Compelled". "Compel". "Compelled". "Compel". This clumsy red herring of yours is going nowhere, robbie. Just address the reasons I gave for my course of action.
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFHow chivalrous, so instead you simply let your cronies gawk on it rather than letting the appropriate authorities deal with it or simply asking suzianne to refrain from sending you any more abusive texts.
If the message had been civil or even angry or even critical, I would have respected its confidentiality. I decided to show it to various forum regulars because it contained specific threats and the abuse was quite extraordinarily demented and deluded. I opted to do this instead of getting Suzianne into trouble with the web site for the reasons I have given.
If you came across serious abuse would you act in the same, would you make it known to your circle of acolytes so they could laugh upon it or would you contact the proper authorities?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhat's all this nonsense about anyone being "compelled"? Were you "compelled" to write the post I am responding to. Was Suzianne "compelled" to make specific threats? Was I "compelled" to report her to the web site and try to get her banned? Of course not. You are in a cul de sac, robbie. You would have (apparently) reported her to the mods, blocked her, and perhaps seen her get a ban. You would not have been "compelled" to do this. I chose a different course of action with better results.
On the contrary i was simply trawling through your posts. Now given the above will you now confirm or deny that the reason that you made these texts public was that you felt compelled to do so because they contained abuse. Is this not the case. If you refuse to do so we shall continue on the basis that this was indeed your motive and that the idea ...[text shortened]... these texts compelled you to act in a specific way is nonsense, you having options open to you.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie"Compelled". "Compel". "Compelled". "Compel". "Compelled". "Compel". "Compelled". "Compel". Nonsense.
There is nothing clumsy about it, its clear from your texts that you feel compelled to share the private mail because they contained abuse.
Originally posted by FMFits a simple question were or were you not compelled to reveal the text because it contained abuse, why you seem to be having great difficulty answering it I cannot say.
What's all this nonsense about anyone being "compelled"? Were you "compelled" to write the post I am responding to. Was Suzianne "compelled" to make specific threats? Was I "compelled" to report her to the web site and try to get her banned? Of course not. You are in a cul de sac, robbie. You would have (apparently) reported her to the mods, blocked her, and per ...[text shortened]... not have been "compelled" to do this. I chose a different course of action with better results.