01 Sep 05
1 edit
Originally posted by shavixmir"Overwhelming evidence" and a "conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt" not a "reasonable chance". It's something completely different.
No. Various people "offered evidence" that there was a reasonable chance he was a cheat.
It's something completely different.
- Joined
- 03 Sep 03
- Moves
- 87628
01 Sep 05
Originally posted by shavixmirIf you think that we took this issue lightly; then you are mistaken.
No. Various people "offered evidence" that there was a reasonable chance he was a cheat.
It's something completely different.
IM31 has a lot of "friends" on the site. If you think Russ would risk alienating them over a "reasonable chance"; then once again you are mistaken.
--tmetzler
01 Sep 05
Originally posted by no1marauderAgreed . I can't see how Russ would be so short sighted that he'd kick off the site's star player for anything less than overwhelming evidence . He'd be better served cutting off his own nose .
"Overwhelming evidence" not a "reasonable chance". It's something completely different.
01 Sep 05
1 edit
Originally posted by shavixmirThis whole business is going to get out of control.
No. Various people "offered evidence" that there was a reasonable chance he was a cheat.
It's something completely different.
One of the game moderators has admitted that it's extremely difficult to determine whether a player is cheating. In other words, there's really no solution.
And yet, the process is under way...
01 Sep 05
Originally posted by no1marauderYes. I know the US justice system is based on "Overwhelming evidence" and "Conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt", doesn't mean to say that it's ever helped all those people sitting wrongly accused on death row. Does it?
"Overwhelming evidence" and a "conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt" not a "reasonable chance". It's something completely different.
Doesn't mean that locking up (or banning from the community) people who may or may not be "criminals" is the best solution to a problem. Does it?
No. The method is wrong. The conclusions are simple and the punishment is just plain moronic.
You and your ilk disappoint me. Disappoint and disgust.
01 Sep 05
Originally posted by shavixmirIs this the beginning of a Rec Race between no1 and shav.... Stay tuned.
Yes. I know the US justice system is based on "Overwhelming evidence" and "Conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt", doesn't mean to say that it's ever helped all those people sitting wrongly accused on death row. Does it?
Doesn't mean that locking up (or banning from the community) people who may or may not be "criminals" is the best solution to ...[text shortened]... he punishment is just plain moronic.
You and your ilk disappoint me. Disappoint and disgust.
01 Sep 05
Originally posted by BowmannRumours and lies spread by heresay.
Correct. And this whole business is going to get out of control.
One of the game moderators has admitted that it's extremely difficult to determine whether a player is cheating. In other words, there's really no solution.
And yet, the process is under way...
Which game-mod said that, and where?
And what do you know about game moderating?
01 Sep 05
Originally posted by BowmannAre you any good?
This whole business is going to get out of control.
One of the game moderators has admitted that it's extremely difficult to determine whether a player is cheating. In other words, there's really no solution.
And yet, the process is under way...
Hmmm, yes, too good....