The moonbus red thumbs poll

@fmf said
My calculated nonsense was, of course, intended to be nonsense that - nevertheless - made a valid point about the silliness that's being posted about "free speech". My post was intended to draw attention to itself.

Like all your posts. No big secret there.

@suzianne said
What?

Look again at the post I was replying to.

It's up to you whether it's a case of What? Whoosh! or not.

-Removed-

Because, unlike you, I do have principles.

@suzianne said
Like all your posts. No big secret there.

You say it's "like [all] my posts", and yet you clearly didn't get it.

@fmf said
I would say that sticking to what I believe and being consistent about it is not something that I am obligated to do. Obligated is the wrong choice of word.

Wrong again, old dog.

-Removed-

No, I'm not like you.

-Removed-

"(sic)"?

You crack me up.

@suzianne said
Wrong again, old dog.

No, you are mistaken. I am not wrong. When adults like you and I are sticking to what we believe and being consistent about it, it is surely not something that we are doing because we are obligated to do so.

-Removed-

You should get that looked at.

@suzianne said
Wrong again, old dog.

A lot of your quippy, hasty 3-4 word posts sell you short, Suzianne.

-Removed-

Work it out with a pencil.

@fmf said
I don't mind criticism. I would have left this website years ago if there was no criticism of my opinions and beliefs. I don't think I look weak in debates and discussions where I receive criticism.

Not when you consistently do nothing but punch down.

On the rare occasion when you have to punch up, you look like, well, an old dog.

-Removed-

And there it is.

The ones you alerted to the poll who disagreed with you.

Why don't you go slag on them a while? Show them who you really are.