@suzianne saidDo you think he should be banned and have his free speech here at RHP ended? You suggested that you thought he should be "tossed" from the website. Is that not a free speech issue?
@divegeester is free to make as big an ass out of himself (and you along with him) as he wants.
22 May 22
@suzianne saidNo, Suzianne, "infantile" really is the point. Your repeated suggestion that I "cannot handle criticism" is not "the point". It's just something you are saying. Indeed, I have been "handling criticism" with an awful lot more aplomb than you have been for years and years.
But "infantile" isn't really the point, is it?The point is that you and he cannot handle criticism.
22 May 22
@fmf saidThe only posts of yours I thumb down are the ones I disagree with, such as you pulling out your 'cat-o-nine-tails' on @KellyJay. You write an astonishingly huge amount of disagreeable things on this website.
Do you send feedback to the website about me? Have you ever asked them to ban me? Or is one anonymous red thumb for just about every single post I ever make, regardless of whether you agree or disagree with its content, sufficient for you and for your vision of how the forums should be?
If I agree with something you write I thumb it up, like normal people do.
Your paranoia about me red thumbing ALL your posts is just that: personality-disorder-level paranoia.
22 May 22
@fmf saidLearn a new trick, old dog.
Do you think he should be banned and have his free speech here at RHP ended? You suggested that you thought he should be "tossed" from the website. Is that not a free speech issue?
I did not say I thought he should be tossed. I SAID that I was surprised his asocial butt wasn't tossed before now.
And as I also said, he's perfectly free to make as big an ass out of himself as he wants. How's that against free speech?
22 May 22
@divegeester saidAll 5 of them.
Several people were “interested “ enough to see it and vote in it. Which indicated that being “interested” enough to vote means that the majority of those “interested” want thumbs removed or made non-anonymous.
Tiny sample size means nothing.
If one person responded, do you think that one person should run the site?
22 May 22
@suzianne saidCat o nine tails!
The only posts of yours I thumb down are the ones I disagree with, such as you pulling out your 'cat-o-nine-tails' on @KellyJay. You write an astonishingly huge amount of disagreeable things on this website.
If I agree with something you write I thumb it up, like normal people do.
Your paranoia about me red thumbing ALL your posts is just that: personality-disorder-level paranoia.
personality-disorder-level paranoia!
Are you ok?
22 May 22
@divegeester saidYeah, that's why you want red thumbs gone so badly.
Everything here is trivial.
22 May 22
@suzianne saidYou've expressed surprise that he hasn't been banned, many times if I recall correctly, and I have never sensed that you would disagree with the decision if it were made. You have never once said that you would oppose it.
And as I also said, he's perfectly free to make as big an ass out of himself as he wants. How's that against free speech?
22 May 22
@suzianne saidYou really should take your critics of the polls and you inability to raise sufficient support of it to moonbus.
All 5 of them.
Tiny sample size means nothing.
If one person responded, do you think that one person should run the site?
Sorry, I couldn’t care less because we won the poll 😁