1 edit
Originally posted by leestaticYou can have the smutt guy, I am sure he is your hero!
He's a legend ...........ok.....lets just think about it for a moment who's life story would you want to listen to.. Willy "yeah programed some stuff an became a billionaire" Gates or Ron I've slept with anything worth sleeping with Jeremy, if i was god Ron would be getting a major Hi Five, Billy would be getting a WTF for Millenium Edition!lol
Bill Gates Story! No Contest
Originally posted by leestaticBill Gates has no need for Ron Jeremy material as you seem to have a craving for.
Whatever i bet Bill has some Ron Jeremy material somewhere and Ron has Linux
Money can buy you anything. Some say it can't buy you health, but it can make you healthy again. If there is no cure, oh well we all got to go, it is just a matter of when not IF.
1 edit
Originally posted by Very Rustymeoww...seems like it's between you and Ron?
Bill Gates has no need for Ron Jeremy material as you seem to have a craving for.
Money can buy you anything. Some say it can't buy you health, but it can make you healthy again. If there is no cure, oh well we all got to go, it is just a matter of when not IF.
Originally posted by duecerDuecer (or should I say, duecer?), the website brings to ruin your postulation that the subject at hand, i.e., income tax, represents the lion's share of support for the most-necessary-for-business-sustenance: bridges and roads.
that website only accounts for how specifically generated income is alloted to states. Highway projects are often part of the earmark system, and have nothing to do with the process you cited.
I get out plenty
Ergo and in conclusion, uh, yer ded rong.
1 edit
Originally posted by FreakyKBHHe likes Paster Duecer. 😉
Duecer (or should I say, duecer?), the website brings to ruin your postulation that the subject at hand, i.e., income tax, represents the lion's share of support for the most-necessary-for-business-sustenance: bridges and roads.
Ergo and in conclusion, uh, yer ded rong.
Man are you guys still arguing about tax money?
Nothing we can do either in the U.S. or Canada, etc., the governments will find a way to blow it on a lot of useless crap.
1 edit
Originally posted by BlackampBULLETIN
ok, so we've established
1. that you don't know jack about the faith you claim to adhere to - it's not all 'hallelujah, brother!' and not making baby Jesus cry, you know; and
2. that you don't live up to the standards of your professed faith.
my work here is done.
😏
Unbeknown to this poster previously, one Blackamp is reported to be a doctor of an established field of medicine. As such, it is believed that said Blackamp has been sworn into the field of medicine and has sworn to practice his art by the dictates of the Hippocratic Oath.
Among the 15 or so promises Blackamp took when he became a doctor of the mind, was...
"... and never do harm to anyone."
In reviewing Blackamps myriad postings of a confrontational, degrading and highly insulting nature toward others and most especially GB, it can only be concluded--- as he stated in his own words----
"... that you don't live up to the standards of your professed faith."
Uh, my work is done here.
EDIT: Oh, crap. I forgot to put an apostrophe between Blackamp and the s. Such a Joyce!
Originally posted by FreakyKBHmaybe you need to re-read my posts.
Duecer (or should I say, duecer?), the website brings to ruin your postulation that the subject at hand, i.e., income tax, represents the lion's share of support for the most-necessary-for-business-sustenance: bridges and roads.
Ergo and in conclusion, uh, yer ded rong.
1. Bridges and roads are certainly a necessary part of commerce, but things like public education, power grids, and and other public services are equally neccessary.
2. You didn't read that website closely enough, and you don't understand the budgeting process, that much is clear.
Originally posted by duecerFAIL
maybe you need to re-read my posts.
1. Bridges and roads are certainly a necessary part of commerce, but things like public education, power grids, and and other public services are equally neccessary.
2. You didn't read that website closely enough, and you don't understand the budgeting process, that much is clear.
Originally posted by FreakyKBHpffft! hardly. Fuel taxes only account for about 70% of the total $$ spent on highways. The rest comes from earmarks on budget proposals. Due to the Byrd ammendment (1982 I think) the Federal Highway admin, is on a pay-gp system, so work mandated by congress would be unfunded mandates, and unconstitutional. That is why general funds are used on highway earmarks.
FAIL
HA!
Originally posted by duecerDude-cer: even using your math, your original contention that the exorbitant amount of income taxes we pay in the US is justified, since the funds go to roads and bridges. Give it up, will ya?
pffft! hardly. Fuel taxes only account for about 70% of the total $$ spent on highways. The rest comes from earmarks on budget proposals. Due to the Byrd ammendment (1982 I think) the Federal Highway admin, is on a pay-gp system, so work mandated by congress would be unfunded mandates, and unconstitutional. That is why general funds are used on highway earmarks.
HA!