Originally posted by BowmannAnti-MTV is the new MTV.
Yes, I have.
You're not interested in progress. You prefer the comfort of familiarity, despite its disadvantages.
XP works like a charm for me. It's simple, intuitive and more than enough for the use I give him. And it doesn't crash, not until now at least. Why should I bother?
Originally posted by PaulieNo. If you look very, very carefully you'll see I responded in a manner identical to your own.
Ahh i see you have resorted to name calling already. Obviously you can`t think of anything more constructive to add. Shame about the IQ then i guess.
Edit: Very, very carefully, mind.
Originally posted by stockenWell, most of the time I don't. When I'm unsure of a word, I type it into google. I hope THEY can spell! I was an English major. Just don't ask me anything about science and extremely little about math/maths, and we'll be fine!😀
You mean when you type here in the forum, badly spelled words aren't automatically underlined in red? They were for me. Of course, you probably never misspell. 😕
Originally posted by PalynkaWell, if you insist on making this a linux vs windows thread (yet another one):
Anti-MTV is the new MTV.
XP works like a charm for me. It's simple, intuitive and more than enough for the use I give him. And it doesn't crash, not until now at least. Why should I bother?
Linux:
Cost (as in none unless you go with a supported distro)
Easy to use (or hard depending on how deep you're willing to go)
Freedom (as in you can do whatever you like with the system without having to worry about copyright laws)
Lots of free programs available (who's equivalents cost money in the windows world)
Great support on the Internet (and it's really easy to learn how to use it to your advantage using google)
Windows:
Comes preinstalled on most computers
Really easy to use
..
.
Well, that's about it really.
Originally posted by PalynkaEvery Windows user experiences the problems inherent in it. Things break, and the user wonders why they never work again; they need to restart their machines often (Linux users can leave their systems switched on for months if they wish)...
XP works like a charm for me...Why should I bother?
Google your way to reasons why Linux is better.
Originally posted by stockenHow about:
Well, if you insist on making this a linux vs windows thread (yet another one):
Linux:
Cost (as in none unless you go with a supported distro)
Easy to use (or hard depending on how deep you're willing to go)
Freedom (as in you can do whatever you like with the system without having to worry about copyright laws)
Lots of free programs available (who' ...[text shortened]... preinstalled on most computers
Really easy to use
..
.
Well, that's about it really.
Linux is a tool.
Windows is a toy.
Originally posted by BowmannLinux is better if you use your computer that intensively. For the average user, the difference is marginal.
Every Windows user experiences the problems inherent in it. Things break, and the user wonders why they never work again; they need to restart their machines often (Linux users can leave their systems switched on for [b]months if they wish)...
Google your way to reasons why Linux is better.[/b]
If I had to install an operating system, I'd install Linux. But to go through the hassle for a marginal difference, I just couldn't be ar§ed.
Besides, I find Linux fundamentalists quite pathetic. I've recently found out about the installation parties some throw. Gives me the creeps.
Originally posted by PalynkaYou know nothing.
Linux is better if you use your computer that intensively. For the average user, the difference is marginal.
If I had to install an operating system, I'd install Linux. But to go through the hassle for a marginal difference, I just couldn't be ar§ed.
Besides, I find Linux fundamentalists quite pathetic. I've recently found out about the installation parties some throw. Gives me the creeps.
Proof:
'hassle'
'marginal difference'
And I don't get invited to those sort of parties ðŸ˜