@kevin-eleven saidLibel requires a statement which is false and malicious.
Oh good: Libel in absentia. Is that what RHP allows?
FMF's post about him is spot on.
There are, in fact, other posters making actual false and malicious statements you could be concentrating on.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidPoor baby! π
During my first year on the site he called me non-sub scum on a daily basis.
-VR
@the-gravedigger saidYou are talking about next to you of course! π π
Truly nightmarish.
All the clones competing to see who could be the forums biggest bozzo.
And because they are clones all winning πππ
-VR
@very-rusty saidI thought it was against TOS to go after someone. Rustboy would never do thatπππ€£
Poor baby! π
-VR
@the-gravedigger saidt-g.....Are you not getting enough attention again? π
Certainly not ! Rooster scours the forums every hour so he can alert breaches of TOS.
-VR
@gambrel saidOh, it's okay for Rusty to spend years calling non-subscribers scum but totally unacceptable to compare his intellect to a flipflop.
I thought it was against TOS to go after someone. Rustboy would never do thatπππ€£
I wonder how many of those non-subscribers were put off from RHP due to Rusty calling them scum?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidHe's too thick to see the hypocracy of his words and actions.
Oh, it's okay for Rusty to spend years calling non-subscribers scum but totally unacceptable to compare his intellect to a flipflop.
I wonder how many of those non-subscribers were put off from RHP due to Rusty calling them scum?