- Joined
- 05 Oct 05
- Moves
- 63425
1 edit
Alright, after two pm's, from other people banned, it is sounding as though two people were arguing in a thread that stocken originally created. Their speculation is that stocken was banned simply for being "caught in the crossfire", (as he was long gone by the time they started bickering.)
Nonsense.
Originally posted by SJ247That does sound pretty weak.
Alright, after two's, from other people banned, it is sounding as though two people were arguing in a thread that stocken originally created. Their speculation is that stocken was banned simply for being "caught in the crossfire", (as he was long gone by the time they started bickering.)
Nonsense.
Originally posted by SJ247thread?
Alright, after two's, from other people banned, it is sounding as though two people were arguing in a thread that stocken originally created. Their speculation is that stocken was banned simply for being "caught in the crossfire", (as he was long gone by the time they started bickering.)
Nonsense.
Originally posted by StarrmanSeemingly (the moderator who banned me never gave an explanation, so I am going with what Phlabibit guessed to be the reason) for quoting a link to a site about the etymology of a "forbidden" word. After some discussions with Phlabibit, I understand why that might be a reason for a ban, but at the time it happened, I had no way of knowing that. And the moderators seem to be divided there.
And why were you banned last time?
Originally posted by NordlysSo, would you say that this is an example of where erring on the side of caution would have saved you from the ban? Personally I agree with you, I do't think that's a bannable offence, but were I to get a ban for such a thing, I'd just put it down to experience.
Seemingly (the moderator who banned me never gave an explanation, so I am going with what Phlabibit guessed to be the reason) for quoting a link to a site about the etymology of a "forbidden" word. After some discussions with Phlabibit, I understand why that might be a reason for a ban, but at the time it happened, I had no way of knowing that. And the moderators seem to be divided there.