Originally posted by Dragon Fire
Apparently you [b]do study endgames the way I do.
I study them to understand basic principles, what to aim for and what to avoid, how to get my pieces working together better if I get there, etc.
but we get off the point as I think we were talking at one stage about someone who alledgedly memorised detailed ending variations and I am merely say ...[text shortened]... oves then as soon as you leave your DB you will blunder and lose as I have seen happen so often.[/b]
a while ago me and some other chess bloggers came across a fairly simple endgame position. one of us is a lower rated endgame enthusias, and the rest more tactically biased players with endgame skills ranging from modest to nonexistent. no, what's interesting, is that even though all of us solved the position correctly, there was a huge difference in the time we used.
the endgame guy solved it almost instantly, where as us tacticians took a lot of time. we dove into calculation, looked at all kinds of lines, and finally ended up with the right one mostly by process of elimination. the endgame guy saw the right first move immediately, and later told us something like "that's just the kind of move that usually works in this kind of situation" or something to that effect.
it wasn't a theory position, but the guy who spends most of his time with endgames could draw from his experience, and immediately spot the right idea. where as us tacticians started shooting into the dark, because we just lacked the experience which would trigger our thoughts into the right direction.
so, in the end, even if the endgame positions you study won't ever appear in your games, you still gain a
lot in intuition by studying them. but that kind of progress is almost impossible to recognize in yourself.