Originally posted by Ramiri15
And what sort of analysis would lead you to this conclusion?
There is no single characteristic that defines cheaters. I am sure you know some from your own life experiences.
I have unfortunately encountered very many engine users in matches in my experience in RHP; all that were banned were highly rated; many are now banned (I can think of 9 that I have played that are now banned) although I suspect a few engine users are not yet banned. They are of various ethnicities; they subscribe to different religions, and are from different countries. Based on their correspondence, some of them seem to be really nice and friendly people! A few claimed to be Christians, and I strongly suspect they were devout believers. Consider that there have been a few engine users in FAITHHOPELOVE. One banned engine user is a medical student. Another is a worker in IT. I suspect that another is a kid. I faced one who apparently has a very advanced education and great knowledge of current events. Some of them had some pretty sound knowledge of chess, and one even recognized when his engine erred and misplayed the position and later suggested an improvement in the postmortem. Some of the most outlandish cheats demonstrate a relatively proficient knowledge of chess (such as IronMan31).
Naturally most of them did not always choose first choice engine moves all the time. Most cheaters are usually not that stupid, although considering that they were banned for cheating, they were pretty inept cheaters as their moves must have very closely matched up with those of an engine!
Essentially an engine user, or one that is banned, demonstrates a lack in chess knowledge, and, of course, a high engine match-up that absolutely indicates engine use. I will not indicate here precisely how one may detect engine use; I think that is rather obvious to detect if you know what to look for, although very strong players are fooled by engines thinking that they are human all the time. Consider the case when Nigel Short being fooled into believing that an engine user was Fischer; he later retracted the claim after Fischer himself denied playing Short online. But think about this, do you really think that engine users will really play the best move in a position all the time? Or even, the best, or second-best, or third-best engine move? Or even engine assistance for all moves?
Why do they cheat? I presume self-esteem is the issue. The illusion exists that things happen for a reason; people try to justify an existence that is without known meaning or purpose, except for where one finds it. Sadly, people find some incentive, some purpose for cheating. Of course, engine use is not rational. But people believe in and do irrational things. Believing in the Christian God, or more broadly, believing in the supernatural, is not rational. Believing in an afterlife, or believing that one retains consciousness when one dies is not rational. Making this post and reading the forums is not rational. I do not benefit much from this post and I have more constructive ways of using my time. Yet I make this post anyway. Why? Because I choose to – in the hope that people are not deceived in the way that I have been in my experience.
Logical thinking is achieved when uses scientific methodologies of inquiry and experimentation. Nothing, whether religion, or one’s statements on a subject regardless of one’s expertise in that subject, should be above scientific inquiry. Therefore, it is bizarre when GM’s make arrogant proclamations such as refuting the Grob or claiming a bust for the KG. For some reason, people are often unwilling to consider ideas outside their own experience, but I suppose people must take comfort in illogical ideas and draw conclusions based on circumstantial evidence in order to preserve their sanity and maintain a sense of identity.
The confusing and frustrating thing to me is that I think people understand all this and still cheat.
So, consider the analysis, and only the analysis, when drawing a conclusion...