Originally posted by ShinidokiI disagree that the move is evidence of use of an engine. However, engine users don't bother me. The player doesn't have the rating, the engine does. But, their play still messes up the ratings of others just a little bit so it's cool to ban them. Proof is another thing altogether and has to be stronger than this.
I belive Fisher once made that exact mistake against Spassky!
(but yes, most human players would not play that)
^edit --- hehe, I should read more carefully, 2 people have already alluded to this! damn it!
Check our this game with blackbuck
Game 3295350
The way he handled that rook endgame seems weird because its so unmethodical and definitely not textbook.
I took the same endgame from move 86 on and solved it and this is what I think it should have looked like via text book procedure
[Event "Clan challenge"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2007.03.11"]
[Round "?"]
[White "denzil53"]
[Black "BlackBuck"]
[Result "0-1"]
[PlyCount "190"]
[EventDate "2007.??.??"]
1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Bg5 Be7 5. cxd5 Nxd5 6. Bxe7 Qxe7 7. Nf3 Nxc3
8. bxc3 Nd7 9. e3 O-O 10. Bd3 e5 11. Qc2 g6 12. O-O Re8 13. e4 c6 14. Rab1 b6
15. Rfe1 Bb7 16. Qc1 c5 17. d5 Rad8 18. Bb5 Qf6 19. c4 Re7 20. Rd1 Qd6 21. Qh6
Nf8 22. Re1 f6 23. Re3 Rg7 24. Nh4 Bc8 25. Rf3 Qe7 26. Ba4 Rd6 27. Re3 f5 28.
Nf3 f4 29. Ra3 g5 30. Qh5 g4 31. Ne1 Qf6 32. Nd3 Re7 33. Ne1 Qg7 34. h4 gxh3
35. Rxh3 Bxh3 36. Qxh3 Rh6 37. Qc8 Qg6 38. Bc2 Rh4 39. Kf1 Qh5 40. Nf3 Rh1+ 41.
Ke2 Rxb1 42. Bxb1 Rg7 43. Qh3 Qxh3 44. gxh3 Ng6 45. h4 h5 46. Bc2 Kf8 47. Ba4
Ke7 48. Kd2 Kf6 49. Be8 Rg8 50. Bxg6 Rxg6 51. a4 Rg8 52. Ke2 a6 53. Kd2 Rb8 54.
Kd3 b5 55. axb5 axb5 56. cxb5 Rxb5 57. Nd2 Rb2 58. Kc3 Ra2 59. f3 Ra1 60. Kc4
Rd1 61. Nb3 Rf1 62. Nd2 Rf2 63. Kc3 Rh2 64. Nb3 Rxh4 65. Nxc5 Ke7 66. Nd3 Kd6
67. Nb2 Rh1 68. Nc4+ Ke7 69. Nxe5 h4 70. Ng6+ Kd6 71. Nxf4 h3 72. Nxh3 Rxh3 73.
Kd4 Rxf3 74. e5+ Ke7 75. Ke4 Rf1 76. Kd3 Rd1+ 77. Ke4 Kd7 78. Kf5 Rxd5 79. Kf6
Rd1 80. e6+ Ke8 81. e7 Re1 82. Kf5 Kxe7 83. Kg4 Kf6 84. Kf4 Re5 85. Kf3 Kf5 86.
Kg3 Re4 87. Kf3 Ke5 88. Kg3 Rf4 89. Kg2 Ke4 90. Kg3 Ke3 91. Kg2 Rf3 92. Kg1 Rf2
93. Kh1 Kf3 94. Kg1 Kg3 95. Kh1 Rf1# 0-1
I think the most precise way to catch someone would be the endgame would it?
Originally posted by HomerJSimpsonRemember this one?
Check our this game with blackbuck
Game 3295350
The way he handled that rook endgame seems weird because its so unmethodical and definitely not textbook.
I took the same endgame from move 86 on and solved it and this is what I think it should have looked like via text book procedure
[Event "Clan challenge"]
[Site "http://www.redho ...[text shortened]...
I think the most precise way to catch someone would be the endgame would it?
Game 2186808
Originally posted by Ramiri15wow, no claimable draws there?? for 3 identical positions or something?
Remember this one?
Game 2186808
Originally posted by HomerJSimpsonI didn't think it was all that bad; maybe except for the last three or four moves...
Check our this game with blackbuck
Game 3295350
The way he handled that rook endgame seems weird because its so unmethodical and definitely not textbook.
I took the same endgame from move 86 on and solved it and this is what I think it should have looked like via text book procedure
[Event "Clan challenge"]
[Site "http://www.redho ...[text shortened]...
I think the most precise way to catch someone would be the endgame would it?
Originally posted by KorchOpaline blasted me off the board in 2 games in less than 20 moves even though I was aware of his rating & moved very slowly & carefully in the games.
wilfried User 117966
opaline User 295081
CypherOz User 289344
Samir Shomali User 264478
I dont feel surprised about wilfried (he seemed to be too perfect for human) and opaline (who won cheater denzil53 with result 2:0 in clan match). Other two I did not know at all.
I didn't make any blunders, so I thought. He just destroyed me cramping me & giving no counter-play whilst attacking constantly. He was 2000 when I played him a couple of months ago then rose to 2200+ withing just a few weeks.
Originally posted by Fat LadyI've done it at least twice.
25. ... Bxh2 is a move no strong human player would ever make - everyone knows that this is a poison pawn
Once was a blunder & more recently Game 3728852 move 10 I play it because I think my B is worth destroying the QS cover. As it happens I didn't take the trapping pawn, but the move isn't always intrinsically bad!
Originally posted by HomerJSimpsonI can't believe they banned Wilfred...
Im kind of suprised by Wilfried he always played such few games
😠
He seemed to be a fair player, I really doubt he used an engine at all. Though I am not tall enough to tell based on his games.
Maybe someone else can look at his games?
