Originally posted by greenpawn34
"He is like that in the spirituality forum too."
There he knows what he is talking about.
I don't know what book he has been reading this week but he
wants to toss it on the fire.
Ah Ronnie I see you posted a game. It was not there last time I looked.
The final note is:
"a game won because of a proper evaluation of the pawn structure and no his is better.}
6. Nxc3 Bxc3 7. Qe2 Bxa1 8. Rxa1 O-O {Draw?}[/pgn]
this is tosh! pure unadulterated double triple hyper tosh, GP, you are a chess Robin
Hood and you need to be brought to justice! you and your merry band of
tacticians! white played the positionally abysmal b3???? yes look at that move
b3??? no forks, no tactics, no pins, no skewers, no discovered attacks, a simple
positional blunder, why? because it undermines a key defender of the d5 square,
the c3 knight, he had no time for c4, his knight was going to be leaving the
board otherwise.
1. b3?? wow look at that, undermining the support of a key defender of the d5
square, had beatlemania a proper and correct understanding of the position based
upon the pawn structure he would never have considered the positionally suicidal,
b3??
1...Qc7
2. Bd3 Rc8
3. Ne2 and a key defender of the all important d5 square must move, normally one
needs to play b5-b4 to do this, but here because of the tragic consequences of
failing to understand the position based upon the pawn structure, the knight is
forced to move of its own accord
4. d5 every Najdorf d pawns dream, to reach the d5 square, why? pawn structure!
Now the question is GP how many of your band of merry tacticians would have
looked at b3 with any significance? they would all be busy calculating this variation
or that variation instead of gaining a proper evaluation of the position based upon
pawn structure, i rest my case!