Originally posted by chessisvanityThat seems like a fairly arbitrary distinction. Why shouldn't masters have a rating? After all there are still large differences in strength.
Well....i don't enjoy sitting down to play a guy who is far stronger or far weaker than i....so i use the rating system to get a decent game.
But....I feel the rating system should be for "class" players.
And once you pass expert and become a master the rating should be rid of.
Ratings are fairly important to me. The closer my rating is to my true skill, the happier I am. The win/loss ration isn't even close instrument as the rating is.
And I want to know how skilled my opponents are. I can see a lot of their rating graph. Some times I even reject a challenge because of the info from their rating graph. If I judge a players skill to 1800 when hi has a actual rating of 1200 points, it's just throwing away points to him.
So I would say, without ratings I lose interest quite quickly.
Rating?
my opponent Game 4417093 decided to stop moving after 40 moves and even asked me to resign. now he moves once at 3 days....
Originally posted by eladyDon't want to comment on a GIP but I guess you feel you could win this and think your opponent is being a jerk by not resigning or moving quickly.
Rating?
my opponent Game 4417093 decided to stop moving after 40 moves and even asked me to resign. now he moves once at 3 days....
I think you are wrong. He is spending a little time finding the forced win (for him) that is there.
Originally posted by Dragon FireHuh? Elady has black.
Don't want to comment on a GIP but I guess you feel you could win this and think your opponent is being a jerk by not resigning or moving quickly.
I think you are wrong. He is spending a little time finding the forced win (for him) that is there.
Originally posted by Dragon FireDon't wish to brag DF but I reckon I could have you from that position! If you really mean that and didn't just get the colours reversed, then when they eventually play out I challenge you to play it as a set piece game...me in eladys shoes of course.
Don't want to comment on a GIP but I guess you feel you could win this and think your opponent is being a jerk by not resigning or moving quickly.
I think you are wrong. He is spending a little time finding the forced win (for him) that is there.
Originally posted by eladyTrying to punish you the only way he can...when it's finished just thank him for the extra time he gave you to study an endgame you've an interest in. I guess though, there are circumstances where someones rate of play slows down for genuine reasons but either way the only thing you can do is ignore it and play on.
Rating?
my opponent Game 4417093 decided to stop moving after 40 moves and even asked me to resign. now he moves once at 3 days....