Originally posted by thaughbaerthere is a simple method, can one not compare the styles? while it is true that pupil and teacher may have the same style, never the less, it should be apparent that while similar they are not identical. If k+p and the dude that went to Africa are one and the same, should it not be apparent in playing styles?
Kings and p0wned... game over.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWell.. there's an answer to that which I couldn't possibly give. Are you trying to get me to say something untoward Robbie ? Naughty naughty...
there is a simple method, can one not compare the styles? while it is true that pupil and teacher may have the same style, never the less, it should be apparent that while similar they are not identical. If k+p and the dude that went to Africa are one and the same, should it not be apparent in playing styles?
Originally posted by thaughbaerno not at all, i would never do that, it just struck me as a plausible way to determine the fact of the matter. 🙂
Well.. there's an answer to that which I couldn't possibly give. Are you trying to get me to say something untoward Robbie ? Naughty naughty...
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieGiven the other facts that have come to light an analysis of playing style would rely on one now very unlikely assumption. But what really annoys me is that wuala has stopped trading. Is there no integrity left in this world ? I like my shoe on the head idea much better. It's instant. No analysis required.
no not at all, i would never do that, it just struck me as a plausible way to determine the fact of the matter. 🙂
1 edit
Originally posted by thaughbaervery unlikely you say . . . .how unlikely, in percentage terms ? ok, now i am being naughty 😛
Given the other facts that have come to light an analysis of playing style would rely on one now very unlikely assumption. But what really annoys me is that wuala has stopped trading. Is there no integrity left in this world ? I like my shoe on the head idea much better. It's instant. No analysis required.
Originally posted by Lex RexPeople who join the site and within 6 months are vying for the number 1 place will always be subject to scrutiny and questioning.
I alerted him to the fact that there was trash talk going on about him. I am a former student of his in chess. I find it disgusting that you all would purposely seek to discredit him. The photos you saw or see, I guess he took it down, are him.
Why don't you guys find something to do worth while in chess rather than discredit another? Come on....
William
He is demolishing highly rated existing players on the site.
Looking at the top USCF ranking it wouldn't be too hard to see if the player in question was rated based on his given age and picture.
http://main.uschess.org/component/option,com_top_players/Itemid,371?op=list&month=1108&f=TopSeniorQ&h=Top%20Quick%20Senior
People aren't necessarily looking to discredit the player, they are looking to see if they can verify that they are as good as they seem to be.
There have been too many people claiming to be something they are not.
Originally posted by adramforallYou're too late. Lex is Kings. Rex is Pawns. Resurrected a dormant account to defend himself. Then changed his profile to thank himself for alerting himself.
People who join the site and within 6 months are vying for the number 1 place will always be subject to scrutiny and questioning.
He is demolishing highly rated existing players on the site.
Looking at the top USCF ranking it wouldn't be too hard to see if the player in question was rated based on his given age and picture.
http://main.usches ...[text shortened]... s they seem to be.
There have been too many people claiming to be something they are not.
I almost believed Lex Rex.. after all anyone who attended Harvard finds a way to mention it in the first sentence when you meet them...
But it is a tad suspcious when someone who has NEVER made a forum post and has timed out every game for months on end mysteriously appears solely to defend their "coach" - how timely.