Originally posted by RahimKYou want to start with personal attack that fine.
You want to start with personal attack that fine.
FOOL! Did you not read that I haven't played chess since Feb 2006, after I won one of the biggest tournies in Edmonton shooting my rating up by 150 points?
I have tooken a 1 year break and I am not at the same level yet. It takes time to get back and shake the rust off.
I don't know who you are. All o ...[text shortened]... u in 2006? 2005?
I don't see you posting anything meaniful to help player below you here.
FOOL! Did you not read that I haven't played chess since Feb 2006, after I won one of the biggest tournies in Edmonton shooting my rating up by 150 points?
I`m critising quality of your lessons not yourself personally. If you take it as personal atack its your problem. Also using word "fool" is really primitive personal attack.
I don't know who you are. All of sudden I see your posts everywhere, knocking everyone because of your rating. Where were you in 2006? 2005?
Information about me is in my profile. Until december of 2006 I` played only about 20-30 games in this site and have been visited this site not too often - only for making moves. And I didn`t read forums then.
About "knocking everyone" - I`m not sure that too many forum readers would agree to this.
I don't see you posting anything meaniful to help player below you here
I would advise to check my posts more carefully. If you are not seeing only what you want to see, you must notice posts which could be useful.
1 edit
Originally posted by KorchYou seem to be the only one sensible here Korch, I will continue this chat with you:
You want to start with personal attack that fine.
FOOL! Did you not read that I haven't played chess since Feb 2006, after I won one of the biggest tournies in Edmonton shooting my rating up by 150 points?
I`m critising quality of your lessons not yourself personally. If you take it as personal atack its your problem. Also using word "fool" is really p ou are not seeing only what you want to see, you must notice posts which could be useful.
I'd like to see you take a year off chess, try to come back and see all the mistakes you make.
How do you know about my quality of lessons? Which one have you read?
I posted a couple of thread about the Reasses your chess workbook, I made a silly mistake and because of that my quality of lessons is bad?
Originally posted by RahimKI have been quitted chess for 2 years - Its really made me weaker mostly with more timetroubles and weakened my tactical sight but not SO much to make such a blunders. I understand that it could happen sometimes, but also your common judgements about position wasnt too qualitative.
I'd like to see you take a year off chess, try to come back and see all the mistake you make.
How do you know about my quality of lessons? Which one have you read?
I posted a couple of thread about the Reasses your chess workbook, I made a silly mistake and because of that my quality of lessons is bad?
Last from your posts I have read. I have read was your post in which your analysis blundered pawn. I have read your other posts too and need to say that in my opinion they are useful for players below 1500-1600.
Originally posted by KorchA 1800 player quiting chess for 1 year and a 2000+ player quitting chess for the same 1 year is not the same.
I have been quitted chess for 2 years - Its really made me weaker mostly with more timetroubles and weakened my tactical sight but not SO much to make such a blunders. I understand that it could happen sometimes, but also your common judgements about position wasnt too qualitative.
Last from your posts I have read. I have read was your post in which your a ...[text shortened]... other posts too and need to say that in my opinion they are useful for players below 1500-1600.
I am considerably weaker after my break.
In your opinion my threads are for people below 1500-1600 right? And who was my audience for those threads?
Did I not make them for players at that level or below?
Originally posted by RahimKRahim, how about that match somebody mentioned earlier?
A 1800 player quiting chess for 1 year and a 2000+ player quitting chess for the same 1 year is not the same.
I am considerably weaker after my break.
In your opinion my threads are for people below 1500-1600 right? And who was my audience for those threads?
Did I not make them for players at that level or below?
Originally posted by RahimKWell, Korch are you going to answer that?
A 1800 player quiting chess for 1 year and a 2000+ player quitting chess for the same 1 year is not the same.
I am considerably weaker after my break.
In your opinion my threads are for people below 1500-1600 right? And who was my audience for those threads?
Did I not make them for players at that level or below?
Because to me, it seems like I make those threads exactly for player below 1600 and they were successful.
Originally posted by RahimKAs I understood words "After all i have done for you" were adressed to such players as cmsMaster (who have rating over 1600) too. Because when he asked what you have done for him, you started to brag about your lessons.
In your opinion my threads are for people below 1500-1600 right? And who was my audience for those threads?
Did I not make them for players at that level or below?
Originally posted by KorchTypo was meant at homerJ. sorry for the confusion.
As I understood words "After all i have done for you" were adressed to such players as cmsMaster (who have rating over 1600) too. Because when he asked what you have done for him, you started to brag about your lessons.
Anything else?