Anyone a Master of Physics?

Anyone a Master of Physics?

Posers and Puzzles

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

u
The So Fist

Voice of Reason

Joined
28 Mar 06
Moves
9908
22 Oct 07

Originally posted by PBE6
It's the study of the impact of nuclear processes on chemistry. Geez... 😞

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_chemistry
It's pronounced nuke-u-lar

GT

Nixa, MO USA

Joined
04 May 07
Moves
16406
22 Oct 07

Originally posted by Ramned
Electrical Energy / Capacitance

[b]16. Suppose scientists had chosen to measure small energies in proton volts rather than electron volts. What difference would this make and why?
[/b]
OK! since I missed the spring question, I'm now on page 11 and will give this a whack! If we measured in proton volts, the resolution of our measurements would be courser by a factor of 1836 since a proton is that many times massier than an electron! Another way of saying it is the our measures of energy would not be nearly so precise!

GT

Nixa, MO USA

Joined
04 May 07
Moves
16406
22 Oct 07

Originally posted by Ramned
Direct Current Circuits

[b]18. Why is it possible for a bird to sit on a high voltage wire without being electrocuted?
[/b]
THIS ONE I'LL GET!! I've NEVER seen a bird straddle two wires!!!

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
22 Oct 07

Originally posted by PBE6
It's the study of the impact of nuclear processes on chemistry. Geez... 😞

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_chemistry
I still think its a misnomer! 😛

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
23 Oct 07

Originally posted by Gary Thomas
OK! since I missed the spring question, I'm now on page 11 and will give this a whack! If we measured in proton volts, the resolution of our measurements would be courser by a factor of 1836 since a proton is that many times massier than an electron! Another way of saying it is the our measures of energy would not be nearly so precise!
nope 😉

I'll post the next question tomorrow

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
23 Oct 07

Quantum Physics

27. An x-ray photon is scattered by an electron which is initially at rest. What happens to the frequency of the scattered photon relative to that of the incident photon?

G

Joined
13 Dec 06
Moves
792
23 Oct 07

Originally posted by Ramned
Quantum Physics

[b]27. An x-ray photon is scattered by an electron which is initially at rest. What happens to the frequency of the scattered photon relative to that of the incident photon?
[/b]
I think it must have a smaller frequency, and therefore less energy, because it has transfered some energy to the electron.

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
23 Oct 07

Originally posted by GregM
I think it must have a smaller frequency, and therefore less energy, because it has transfered some energy to the electron.
yes, next one coming

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
23 Oct 07

Atomic Physics

28. (A) Why do lithium, potassium, and sodiu exhibit similar chemical properties? (B) Why is stimulated emission important in the operation of a laser?

Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1115383
23 Oct 07

Originally posted by Ramned
Atomic Physics

[b]28. (A) Why do lithium, potassium, and sodiu exhibit similar chemical properties? (B) Why is stimulated emission important in the operation of a laser?
[/b]
They are in the same chemical family. That means that all chemicals in a chemical family exhibit similar properties. The reason for this is that chemical properties (ionic charges, electron shell filling, bonding, are all related to the number of electrons and orbitals available for shedding or picking up or bonding in the outer shells, or sometimes, with transition elements, more complicated middle shells.

Anway, lithium, sodium, and potassium are all highly reactive metallic elements that easily ionize (give up one electron) in chemical reactions.

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
24 Oct 07
2 edits

Originally posted by coquette
They are in the same chemical family. That means that all chemicals in a chemical family exhibit similar properties. The reason for this is that chemical properties (ionic charges, electron shell filling, bonding, are all related to the number of electrons and orbitals available for shedding or picking up or bonding in the outer shells, or sometimes, with t ...[text shortened]... ghly reactive metallic elements that easily ionize (give up one electron) in chemical reactions.
Don't forget part b. Part a is correct though.

Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1115383
24 Oct 07

Originally posted by Ramned
Atomic Physics

[b]28. (A) Why do lithium, potassium, and sodiu exhibit similar chemical properties? (B) Why is stimulated emission important in the operation of a laser?
[/b]
Part b. Sorry. It was easy to overlook as the answer sounds too easy and circular. LASER is an acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. The characteristic of a LASER that is so important is that the light emitted is all "in phase." That is, the waves are running together at exactly the same time. All the little waves add up in power to one big . . or HUGE wave. So, "stimulated emission" is important because that is what causes all the light waves to be emitted in phase (all together). It's like in a school of fish or a flock of birds where they all turn together in the same direction at exactly the same time. We can't see why just by looking, but they do. One small stimulus causes them all to move together. It's just that in a laser it's millions of ions emitting together at the same time.

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
24 Oct 07

Originally posted by coquette
Part b. Sorry. It was easy to overlook as the answer sounds too easy and circular. LASER is an acronym for Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation. The characteristic of a LASER that is so important is that the light emitted is all "in phase." That is, the waves are running together at exactly the same time. All the little waves add up in po ...[text shortened]... her. It's just that in a laser it's millions of ions emitting together at the same time.
good, i just threw that one in there 😛

R
The Rams

Joined
04 Sep 06
Moves
13491
24 Oct 07

Nuclear

29. Two samples of the same radioactive nuclide are prepared. Sample A has twice the initial activity as sample B. How does the half-life of A compare with the half-life a B? (B) After each has passed through five half-lives, what is the ratio of their activities?

m

Joined
07 Sep 05
Moves
35068
24 Oct 07

Originally posted by Ramned
Nuclear

29. Two samples of the same radioactive nuclide are prepared. Sample A has twice the initial activity as sample B. How does the half-life of A compare with the half-life a B? (B) After each has passed through five half-lives, what is the ratio of their activities?
Unless I'm missing something obvious...

The half-life is dependent on the material. So the two samples have the same half-life.

In which case, the ratio of their activities does not change. After one half-life, A and B have both halved their activity.