Originally posted by @freakykbhAll right, okay! I lied, there is no branch manager... it's just me.
Don't let them make me evolve waiting on hold!
I'll start you off with a free sample. After that it's $49.95 for a one week supply plus shipping and handling,
or $209.67 per month plus shipping, and the fondling is free.
( handling... the handling is free )
08 Sep 17
Originally posted by @lemon-limeLet's skip communion, mkay?
All right, okay! I lied, there is no branch manager... it's just me.
I'll start you off with a free sample. After that it's $49.95 for a one week supply plus shipping and handling,
or $209.67 per month plus shipping, and the fondling is free.
( handling... the handling is free )
08 Sep 17
2 edits
Originally posted by @freakykbhhuh?
Let's skip communion, mkay?
aww crap, I lost my train of thought...
Damn it, Jim... I'm a medical doctor, not a physician!
08 Sep 17
Originally posted by @lemon-limeWe were doing so good. For a few posts, there was a real conversation. You had "evolutionists" admitting that evolution doesn't explain life's origins.
Yes, yes... of course. That's it.
Self replicating ribonucleic acid!
I see it now.
Oh, what a fool I've been... forgive me, forgive me for ever doubting the awesome power of mindless evolution.
Come Freaky, come and join us in mindless celebration.
[youtube]nZMuBIJxmnA[/youtube]
This direction is strange though. Are you accepting the fact that evolution can't explain life's origins? Can you offer a better scientific explanation?
This is the science forum after all.
08 Sep 17
Originally posted by @wildgrassYou had "evolutionists" admitting that evolution doesn't explain life's origins.
We were doing so good. For a few posts, there was a real conversation. You had "evolutionists" admitting that evolution doesn't explain life's origins.
This direction is strange though. Are you accepting the fact that evolution can't explain life's origins? Can you offer a better scientific explanation?
This is the science forum after all.
Most evolutionists (scientists) gave trying to explain that a long time ago.
This direction is strange though.
( shhhhh, Landru is listening )
Are you accepting the fact that evolution can't explain life's origins?
Can you accept the fact that I already knew this?
Can you offer a better scientific explanation?
Nope.
This is the science forum after all.
You might want to remind some of your colleagues of this 'fact'. I only said "take it to the spirituality forum" once, but I could have said it on several other occasions. If you're really wondering about this strange direction I've taken it's because I'm finally weary of straw man attacks, called upon to repeat myself page after page, and of being called stupid, moron, arrogant, etc. etc. We could have covered the same ground in 2 or three pages (four tops) without all of the rancorous attacks against theists and religion and so called 'science deniers'.
You seemed to be willing to try a saner approach, and this is why I stayed with it as long as I have. But honestly, I didn't just fall out the sky yesterday morning... I know a quick study when I see one, and I can quickly scan links and put ideas and information together in my own words as well as the next quick study artist.
But without critical thinking skills the best scientists in the world won't (because they can't) be more than water carriers for the lowly 'Einsteins'.
Originally posted by @lemon-limeI think everyone understands your position. Evolution (and science for that matter) can't and doesn't pretend to explain everything.
[b]You had "evolutionists" admitting that evolution doesn't explain life's origins.
Most evolutionists (scientists) gave trying to explain that a long time ago.
This direction is strange though.
( shhhhh, Landru is listening )
Are you accepting the fact that evolution can't explain life's origins?
Can you accept th ...[text shortened]... s in the world won't (because they can't) be more than water carriers for the lowly 'Einsteins'.[/b]
Science is a method, not a belief. You can fill in the holes with your beliefs, or speculations, or hypotheses.
Originally posted by @lemon-lime"Most evolutionists (scientists) gave [up] trying to explain that a long time ago."
[b]You had "evolutionists" admitting that evolution doesn't explain life's origins.
Most evolutionists (scientists) gave trying to explain that a long time ago.
This direction is strange though.
( shhhhh, Landru is listening )
Are you accepting the fact that evolution can't explain life's origins?
Can you accept th ...[text shortened]... s in the world won't (because they can't) be more than water carriers for the lowly 'Einsteins'.[/b]
( the little mistakes are the most difficult to spot )
Originally posted by @lemon-limeChristians cannot grasp scientific ideas that goes against their beliefs.
"Most evolutionists (scientists) gave [up] trying to explain that a long time ago."
They just cannot believe in science because they just cannot understand it, yet they use the fruits of science every day. What hypocrites they are...
Originally posted by @fabianfnasI have a suspicion that many could understand it if they wanted to but don't because they, by desperately and deliberately confusing and encrypting perfectly simple scientific concepts in their head (as clearly shown by their posts here) that the average half-wit can understand, CHOOSE to be confuse about it because they see that it contradicts their religion.
They just cannot believe in science because they just cannot understand it, ...
09 Sep 17
Originally posted by @fabianfnasLandru is pleased.
Christians cannot grasp scientific ideas that goes against their beliefs.
They just cannot believe in science because they just cannot understand it, yet they use the fruits of science every day. What hypocrites they are...
09 Sep 17
Originally posted by @humyThis too pleases Landru.
I have a suspicion that many could understand it if they wanted to but don't because they, by desperately and deliberately confusing and encrypting perfectly simple scientific concepts in their head (as clearly shown by their posts here) that the average half-wit can understand, CHOOSE to be confuse about it because they see that it contradicts their religion.
09 Sep 17
Originally posted by @wildgrassI didn't get a "Harrump" from that one.
We were doing so good. For a few posts, there was a real conversation. You had "evolutionists" admitting that evolution doesn't explain life's origins.
This direction is strange though. Are you accepting the fact that evolution can't explain life's origins? Can you offer a better scientific explanation?
This is the science forum after all.
09 Sep 17
1 edit
Originally posted by @fabianfnasEvolutionists cannot grasp faiths that go against their belief.
Christians cannot grasp scientific ideas that goes against their beliefs.
They just cannot believe in science because they just cannot understand it, yet they use the fruits of science every day. What hypocrites they are...
They just cannot believe in faith because they just cannot understand it, yet they use the fruits of faith every day.
What hypocrites they are...[/b]
Originally posted by @humyThat is pretty much the definition of 'cognitive dissonance'.
I have a suspicion that many could understand it if they wanted to but don't because they, by desperately and deliberately confusing and encrypting perfectly simple scientific concepts in their head (as clearly shown by their posts here) that the average half-wit can understand, CHOOSE to be confuse about it because they see that it contradicts their religion.