16 Jul '18 02:41>1 edit
The post that was quoted here has been removedIn your opinion? Which is worth something between Jack and sh%t, and Jack's out of town
Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracksThe algebra is correct. However, it is not at all clear to me that your argument works. You've rewritten the equation roughly as follows:
I see you edited
Do I?
If you would like to produce a counter example where 1/(14n + 3) or
3 minus that expression CAN be simplified (choose your 'n' from infinity integers), then I will withdraw.
Do I need to explain why 1 over an integer cannot be cancelled?
Or that n/(an +/- 1) cannot be simplified, a being any integer ?
Ho ...[text shortened]... eed full explanation and mine does?
Now then, this thumbs down. Ok. I will ask
Was it you?
Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracksI checked the algebra before I posted and do not need to "try it". You've now got a fraction (3N - 1)/N. Suppose N is odd. Then (3N - 1) is even and the factor of 2 you've discarded divides it. You insist that this factor is irrelevant on the grounds that it's 'used up', the problem is this language, it really isn't clear what you mean.
Lets try
the 1/2 is irrelevant, as that is 'used up' if you recombine the '3 - 1/(14n + 3)' to produce the original expression. Try it.
Now concentrate on the '3 - 1/(14n + 3)'
14n + 3 is an integer, so let us replace it with N
3 - 1/N = (3N-1)/N
i referenced this earlier. I assume you are familiar with the fact that (3N -1)/N ...[text shortened]... plained all of this also to the learned sages who mark the Maths Olympiad, and hope to score 1/7
Originally posted by @deepthoughtIt is to me . I am not a Maths teacher, I just explain as best I can what is patently obvious to me. Sorry if that falls short of your expectations, but , frankly I don't care.
[b]I checked the algebra before I posted and do not need to "try it". You've now got a fraction (3N - 1)/N. Suppose N is odd. Then (3N - 1) is even and the factor of 2 you've discarded divides it. You insist that this factor is irrelevant on the grounds that it's 'used up', the problem is this language, it really isn't clear what you mean.