20 Jul '18 19:47>
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
The post that was quoted here has been removedAll of which Deep Thought has now corrected his position on with the following statement!
Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracksYes, I'm burning out on it too.
Hi , Joe.
Thanks for the support.
All I did was suggest, in no challenging way whatsoever, an alternative method.
My problem on this forum is knowing where one has to 'explain to'. With no arrogance, it was clear to me that presenting the original expression in another form showed that it could not be cancelled any more.
For what it ...[text shortened]... she/he feels is in any way disagreeing with her/him is the reason that I rarely visit RHP now.
Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracks"For what it is worth, I do think D64 is 'good at Maths'. Unfortunately this poster's shrieking abuse to anyone she/he feels is in any way disagreeing with her/him is the reason that I rarely visit RHP now."
Hi , Joe.
Thanks for the support.
All I did was suggest, in no challenging way whatsoever, an alternative method.
My problem on this forum is knowing where one has to 'explain to'. With no arrogance, it was clear to me that presenting the original expression in another form showed that it could not be cancelled any more.
For what it ...[text shortened]... she/he feels is in any way disagreeing with her/him is the reason that I rarely visit RHP now.
Originally posted by @joe-shmoYour sentiments against her, now exposed, fraud in mathematics, mirror my own regarding her political exaggerations and lies against the United States.
"For what it is worth, I do think D64 is 'good at Maths'. Unfortunately this poster's shrieking abuse to anyone she/he feels is in any way disagreeing with her/him is the reason that I rarely visit RHP now."
I disagree about her actual abilities:
1) Yesterday she couldn't verify that "your simple algebraic manipulation was correct" nor would she e ...[text shortened]... with her deranged fantasy. But the Duchess loves the attention, so I think Ill give it to her.
Originally posted by @blood-on-the-tracksYou can Google most anything lol.
Hi Joe
In answer to point 4 above, D64 DID produce a neat proof that root 2 is irrational in that thread, which she/he didn't start.
Why I am putting forward a defence of a poster that frequently treats me to braying insult is beyond me.
But , anyway, there it is.
Originally posted by @eladarDon't you teach HS math? Did you ever have to come up with that proof?
You can Google most anything lol.